R-Darter is equivalent.
I know this cause I use them.
Well it should actually BE better ,but the truth is its not even close to the performance of the 120 ,darters are basiclly useless beyond 15 km ,from your coment its clear you never played with them
Bro i have 1000 Kills in SAAF gripen ,of course u can rat around and get Kills ,but u could do that with 120 too ,point here is darters can t compete in bvr with 120 , overall 120 is much better than darter
AGM-65G has not been introduced for all Gripens. Just the Swedish C this update.
Its been done as the Gripen C was cleared for use with it and the weapon was integrated to the platform. As this is Sweden’s current top fighter and only current AMRAAM carrier, all this does is bring it into line with the other Gripens.
The British tree has multiple FOX-3 carriers already with AIM-120 with the Tornado F.3 Late and Sea Harrier. So the SAAF Gripen gets domestic missiles.
2 Likes
Agm65g was only introduced to sweden now but it was already introduced to other gripens earlier so yes it was introduced to all gripens due to balancing reasons , darters where never used by SAAF gripens and where never part of there integrated weapons system ,there where only used in the cheatah , Aim 120 on the other hand are integrated in gripen weapons system ,and this makes SAAF gripen currenty unbalanced too other gripens due to the fact that darters (for some weird reason )are overall much inferior to 120 ,so yes SAAF gripen should get 120
Saab oficial website clearly states all weapons that gripens can use and darters are not One of them
SAAF gripen is only top tier plane in UK tree aswell, tornado and harrier can t be compared to gripen they are much inferior
It was not. JAS-39A does not have them. Not all Gripens got them. Only those that were cleared to use them and integrated with it.
Britain already has 2 other AMRAAM carriers. Sweden has only one. Darters are a domestic missile that were introduced spesifically for the SAAF Gripen. If / when more domestic missiles become available, they may also be introduced. We currently have no plans to give it AMRAAMs.
1 Like
Sorry no ofense,but your arguments keep getting worse , how can u even mention gripens a , we are talking about the the game in its present state , gripen a is 12. 7 ,it can t be compared to a 13.0 ,
Tornando and sea harrier are 12.7 , 12.3 they canot BE compared to 13.0
Darters are domestic to SA ,but where never used in gripen c ,they where nt even in production anymore by the time SA adquired the gripens , they are not part of the gripens integrated weapons system , if they where added to the game for that use than it was a big mistake by Gaijin that should be corrected ,this is all common knowledge with very little research from oficial documents and respective oficial websites
I mean we could also argue the fact that why should britain get another carrier for ARH? They have three of them, sweden only has 1 and couldve gotten the JA37D but it would be inferior to the 12.3 harriers because of radar and IR missiles. Britain has ARH carriers that can use AIM 120 so thats how it is.
With the changes done to the rails for A-darter there is also no reason to suspect they could mount AIM 120
12.7 and 12.3 can t be compared to 13.0 planes , but if u ask me ,yes jas37 should get fox3 ,and gripen a should get them too ,or just lowest its br
Too late for that, gripen A cant get ARH because then you have the Gripen C having AGM 65 be the only difference. Dont get me wrong i like finally having a JAS39C but its not a jas39C rn. Its a gripen A late rn. Its missing a lot of things that would make it a C model like the 5th pylon rail which has been acknowledged for months. Also i just dont see a reason to make the SAAF gripen up to par when britain has other AIM 120’s, go ahead and tell me rn why grind the swedish air tree for a Gripen? You can just get better ones on other nations which have other vehicles that arent trash. Going forward the Gripen E will go to Italy via brazil.
Still waiting on an actual meaningful difference, i mean its the JA37D all over again. Grind same plane for one new mod.
Scroll down to bottom of page and Open gripen c packing iron PDF sheet ,they have all the weapons that are integrated in any gripens c weapons system the information is clear and comes from the manufacture, there is no r darter mention , a darter is a complety difrent míssil its a ir míssil
Gaijin made a mistake and have to fix it because information is clear
So where is the 5th rail for bombs? Where is voice warning system?, where is MAW’s?, and where is the historical correction to BOL CM pods? These are missing from Gripen C. Also Aim 9m’s should be removed from the SAAF gripen as they never used them, just IRST. Same could be said for sweden but we dont know what they used the aim9L-i’s they bought for. Im just saying britain got treated pretty well for their air. Why should their gripen get buffed when they have a unique and historical missiles that was planned available and other arh carriers. Yak 141 has its planned missiles. Besides the rails were definitely changed for A darter and there is no way to tell if they wpuld be able to work with AIM 120 in that config.
Maybe you should play sweden air, instead of probably just the US and britain. It would be good for you to actually see this view from more than 2 nations.
UK gripen also had skyflashes while sweden had 7m which are much better só it wasn t all in favour of britain , but thats not the point here , u mention A-darter ,thats not the r darter , those are difrent missils , when gripen c was designed it was designed to BE able to use a great variety of weapons , its integrated weapons system (the cpu that is used to launch missils) was programed to many weapons ,u can see all of them in the saab website i left link in above coment, r darters are not One of those weapons , 9m , a darters and 120 are , so even if some nations didn t use them they could BE used , r darters could not he used
Lmao 7M, they were skyflashes, RB 71 is a skyflash lmao. They were bough and used on the viggens also. When the JA37A was originally annouced british players were rightfully upset that they didnt get skyflashes first. So gaijin gave them skyflashes when they added PD with that update.
R darter was planned for the SAAF gripen, iirc they stopped the program cause it wasnt worth upgrading all JAS39C’S to carry them when they had vehicles like the Atlas Cheetah to use those missiles.
Ok Ur right there , my bad On that One they are skyflashes , but thats not my point here i agree with u that all gripens should have been equal from start ,but u should not make the same mistakes Over and Over and that is what Gaijin is doing again
Thats because r darter was not part of the integrated weapons system , they never used them , and never could use them
And i already said this yesterday thats not how it works. Nor is it how the community works. People suffer for X amount of time now its X communities time to suffer that how this vicious cycle continues. Not my choice its the peeps who make the rules and so far this is the route they’ve decided. Why did the pt76 57 get to fight in the 6.7 BR for sim for months with a stabilizer and laser rangefinder? Why did finland get a 2a6 which at the time was germany’s best tank. I dont know what choices the devs decide on so keep spamming Smin i guess. Hes just a messenger so do with that what you will.