Baden’s mantlet bug has been here ever since the ship was introduced to the game, I can’t understand how it hasn’t been fixed yet despite having been “acknowledged” twice.
Then there’s the M735 matter. It was artificially nerfed on what the devs immediately acknowledged as a wrong bug report with mistaken information. Yet they still needed it and did not apply the fox that has been warranted for several months.
A technical moderator made a correct bug report shortly after M735 was needed due to the wrong one… yet no fix in sight.
Also the numerous missing spall liners on tanks like the Challenger 2/3s (lower front plate), the Leclercs or pretty much every Rank VIII Chinese MBT. Or the present day Merkava Mk.4 having worse armor than IPM1/Leopard 2A4/T-72A, etc.
This is the kind of bugs many of us check every changelog in hopes of finding fixed. They have an enormous impact on the game and it’s incredibly disappointing to see them not addressed or corrected for months, and months, and months.
oh cool, actually didn’t know this, thx for the info!
the JAS39A didn’t have the necessary pylons to mount the correct rails nor the electronic infrastructure needed to be able to handle the newer variants of the rails/missiles (if i have understood things correctly). The JA39C’s main purpose was to make it international and able to integrate all NATO munitions as needed as well as the aerial refuel capability.
AGM-65 for the Swedish JAS-39C is nothing to do with double standard. It simply brings it in line with the other Gripen loadouts. The C was integrated with the weapon and cleared for usage.
This is nothing to do with a double standard, simply that this is Sweden’s best aircraft currently, it’s about balancing it with the other Gripens in line with equipment it can have and also directly based on player feedback requests asking for this weapon on the Gripen C.
All the Strv 122 variants have the extra composite beak AND spall liners (a la 2A7V) on the hull that makes it vastly more robust than the 2A5s and 6s. Also the PLSS and B+ have the secondary ammo rack higher up in the hull making them a lot more immune to detonations on LFP penetrations if you wanted to carry more than 16 rounds.
But I agree, before top tier, Sweden is good but nothing too special. Highlights of the grind are the T-34/Pz IV combo early on and the Pbv 501/T-34-85/Charioteer in the mid-tier. With the later I have in the upper 60% WR range so I guess it’s pretty damn good XD
well this complete sentence is in, my opinion, kinda funny, because all vehilces mentioned there are not swedish, directly those vehicle are nighter special for sweden, so i think those vehicle, maybe besides the charioteer who gotten a better shell, are still woking the same in thier origin nation. so the do not outright make sweden “stronger”.
furthermore i personally think that in the br of the t34 and pz IV the swedish spg are way stronger
What about adressing the fox 3 balance ingame right now , if u give all gripens the agm u should also give gripens the option to use aim 120 ,the c model was developed to BE able to use all NATO weapons and the UK gripen is clearly underperforming right now due to the r darters s , they can and should have option to use 120 ,just like they have agm which they didn t use but can use , either that or balance out other f0x 3 to be able to compete in bvr with 120
It’s never worked for helicopters. Why they don’t balance ah-64djp with the other ah-64d in line with equipment it can have? Why can’t we balance US ah-64d with Israel one?
It’s never worked for Japan anti-ground ammunition. Where gbu for Japan? Feedback from wrong nation?
It’s never worked for strv121/122. Where are dm53 and dm12a1 to bring them in line with the other top-tier leopard? They can have it.
And there are plenty of similar cases. And for some reason they are not solved in the same way as the case with Sweden and agm-65g. But it’s not double standard ofc.
That’s an excellent point btw.
I like the darters, though. They’re worse at long range, but they’re much better up close.
They couldve added the finnish Charioteer with the 20 pounder instead of the 17, its a unique modification for finland, they also couldve added the nikki, klimi, or sturmi which wouodve been more unique (well not the klimi)
They received JAS39C after waiting 2 updates only to have to wait for 3 weeks for it to finally be on par in CAS. In air they could get AIM 120 but i mean literally the best gripen isnt swedish that would be italy since it never had to wait for it to get aim 120’s you just had to get one mod on release.
Swedish gripen uses Aim 120 too ,rb99 is aim120 with another name ,so the ONLY weaker gripen is SAAF on UK tree ,darters can t compete in bvr ,so if Gaijin wants to balance game by giving all of them agm ,all of them should get Aim 120 too cause irl they didnt use agm either but where capable of using them ,making it just pointless fact that Gaijin adds agm to all and not Aim 120 to all ,Gaijin have responded to reports claiming there is no Proof of aim120 in SAAF gripens but where s the Proof of agm on SAAF gripens , the truth is all gripens have the ability to use all these weapons so if they add agm they have to add 120
I have made report on it so all UK gripen players should go there and report same issue ,Gaijin should not have difrent standards regarding the same issues ,if all get agm all should get Aim 120
Actually SAAF gripens never used darters or aim9m ,they use iris t and Meteor
Then why did gaijin also give the better gripens to two other nations before sweden? Its a double standard. Swedish players had to fight to get a competitive vehicle because gaijin though a f16a equivalent would be fine when 12.3 came to the game. Sorry but No HMD, CM pods or 9M’s wasnt equivalent to the SAAF gripen. Even then we were told wed get the gripen C first update of 2024. Wasn’t there. And its the JA47D all over again. We have to research a “new” aircraft again with 1 difference being missiles. I’m bot saying the gripen C for SAAF shouldnt get aim 120’s but you crying about it then saying sweden is unfairly treated is hilarious when you cant even see that sweden wasnt treated fairly when the gripen first came lol.
I never Said sweden was t unfairlly treated ,they where ,u must BE mistaking someone else s coment ,i agree with u ,gripens should all have the same capabilitys from the start ,sweden should have had the c model from start , Im just claiming that now UK is the One underperforming ,and that Gaijin should nt be making the same mistake all Over again
i think you are forgetting the JAS39A Sweden has. and that is the one they got when everyone else got JAS39C and Sweden had to wait until now to get the JAS39C.