wht hell with the fuel tank, completely crush the armor? I’m afraid I can kick it away with just one foot
and where did this non-existent basket come from? Why don’t you tell me what a tank with an automatic loading machine and double crew members in turret needs this basket for? Besides, didn’t you see the ammunition in the front fuel tank when you were making the model? Can you tell me how to move the ammunition like this
and what’s going with the battery in the same location as the leopard? perhaps Gaijin think they already pay money on models and not installing them in all of tank would be a loss?
If gaijin continues to maintain this attitude, then they should not continue updating the game
35 Likes
I almost forgot, when you were making the model, couldn’t you even distinguish between the cabin partition and the loading machine?
30 Likes
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
if its on the dev server its just a work in progress and isn’t final, dude just give it some time
1 Like
VT5 is a 33-ton light MBT instead of an 18-ton airborne assault gun! Are you being funny gaijin? The fronts and sides of this tank could not even withstand the fire of heavy machine guns! The T-54 weighs 36 tons, and the 33-ton VT5 is even inferior to an armored car!
14 Likes
Amazing ridiculous structures,couldn’t figure out how gaijin think tank works.
4 Likes
I saw several that were accepted for the vt5 on bug reports, a lot of them though are just nonsense and repeated the same thing they already said wasn’t a bug
1 Like
Then why change leo2’s basket, it was also work in progress before.
they didnt, they just showed that the damage model isn’t the same as the x-ray model
1 Like
That is exactly what I just said
May your words ring true in time, but before what you said becomes reality, we need to first make our stance clear
1 Like
Gaijin is not serious about making the VT5
2 Likes
Why add something that doesn’t exist instead of repairing armor?
2 Likes
Just to satisfy your own prejudice against China?
2 Likes