Unless its russian lol
1 Like
but said he believed someone with 0 experience more just because… you had the same value of him?
Then it’s fucked in a good way (for them anyway)
He has almost double your matches and is making far more coherent points, curb your victim complex and play some more matches in the 2s38
I mean if we want to add realism then make russian mbts 1/10 the spawnpoints of leo 2a7since it costs that much, no problem
I’m not talking about soviet vehicles, im talking about overall game experience
Indeed… this list would be DRASTICALLY DIFFERENT if it weren’t for all of the artificial nerfs that plague many of the MBTs.
Type 10 would easily be the second best tank, and the Merkavas would be among the best ones too. SEPv2 would be higher too, and ZTZ99A would be better than T-80BVM. The Leclercs and Challengers would be higher as well.
“i never drive a bugatti veyron but i think i can talk about its and knows about it more than a bugatti veyron owner just because i drove my 2003 fiat panda more than he drove his bugatti veyron”
this is how you sound like
Going to ARB was nothing but a proof to you that mixed battles can happen when RU is the dominant force, which doesn’t suit your narrative.
Russia was never as dominant in the air as it is in ground with the pantsir today though… Su34 players catching 95ya6 with their teeth before they get to unleash their point and click is very different from a R27ER duel… Cmon man please make an effort
People being upset in those numbers makes it look like a much bigger issue than GRB today, especially tanks-only talk.
Except this talk is backed up by stats which have probably never been this bad for this long and for a single team (the one upset), so again false equivalence
You can think whatever you want, doesn’t make it any more truthful though.
That’s just nuh-huh with extra words.
CQC below the gun is very reliable just like the abrams and so are all the spots that work on non-russian tanks. But this goes back to needing to learn to aim so I shouldn’t be surprised you’re bouncing on a Leopard as a RU main
And 1/10 as survivable if you want to go down that route, throw in the inexperienced teenage crews, unreliable ammo, horiffic cook-offs and tranmission/FCS faults then you are in for a rough ride in your t-80u
I mean that is obvious since they cost much more then other tanks like challangers or russian tanks, but if the game goes for realism over balance, then just play dcs for air and make the spawnpoints of tanks that are cheaper also be relative to the cost
ok, also then make me command a whole tank batallion since russia has 12k tanks, and make abrams engine shut down beacuse of overheating periodically
I have far more matches in russia than you, i know far more about russian tech than you, not buying the 2s38 is a personal choice because i don’t believe it should be in the game, could very well still beat you in one while playing a fox though
1 Like
Had*
1 Like
so how if soviet vehicles was so meta. And you are so powerful with your soviet why are your BMP-2M performance are just like mine?
The game would actually be much more balanced if not for the bugs and artificial nerfs.
Most vehicles would be fair counterparts to each other, instead of being severely worse because of bugs.
For example, Type 10’s broken steering and missing acceleration, Merkava’s rubber armor, Challenger 2’s missing spall liners, broken first-order ammorack replenishment speed and size, etc.
1 Like
Still more then all of nato combined, talking about realism in a arcade game like this is a joke
Because i was bad, not the tank
You brought it up gng???