You’re showing off your great game knowledge, no wonder you think CR2 and Merkava are better.
All that stalinium and you still didn’t manage 2 K/D, sucks I guess.
We were talking about M1s and my view on them is definitely more objective than yours, as I haven’t claimed anything egregious, it was you that did that.
Yes they were.
Forum was up in flames about ERs and people demanded counters.
Just like it’s being done in this thread.
Those things literally solved all cons of 2A6, making them have the least amount of drawbacks in the game.
No, receiving great armor and survivability while being the best at other things is.
2A7s are the only tanks without a crippling flaw of their own.
Lack of reverse speed and gun depression makes them viable in only one playstyle.
Reverse speed and sub par reload are big cons of CQC as well.
Not to mention the fact it’s the only half decent tank Britain has for top tier. The other Challys are the same thing but even worse because of worse engine and no CITV
First of all i dont play the meta i play what i like
But second i did started playing russia its just my least played nation from the 4 im playing and btw this is the easiest nation by far i just grinded the t55 which is broken asf look at that stabeld apfsds at 8.3 same br as leo 1 btw like wtf is this a joke?
Outside of top tier, USA also has their own king of SPAA which people call him sergeant York, I have never been amazed by a SPAA that is so effective, my favourite br is literally 8.7 to 9.0, the York is better than the Pantsir in its respective br.
Lol are u fr?😂
Israel suffers so hard no top tier spaa merkava and namers are hella nerfed only cas is good but almost everytime go against the pantsir
It’s a minor detail on a tank I don’t play seriously
More important here is my ability to admit when I’m wrong instead of plugging my ears and playing semantics (stinger average etc) because I only care about what’s true
Nothing more objective than stats and those are clearly irrelevant to you, again with only being concerned with appearance. yawn
Nope. They were decent and like I said 9Ls more than made up for the difference compared to R60M.
Situation is reversed today, 120 is king, R77 are “waaaah horrible” (actually not that bad) but R73s are better than 9Ms, making up for it at short range. All is well, except if you’re a weird fanatic of course.
2A6 were not better than russian tanks and even most russian mains recognized that. The protection also still isn’t as great as the T80s except maybe in your mind. Reverse speed is a downside but not crippling on a press W tank, not as much as bigger weakpoints. But ofc gluttons want it all.
Again armor is the most important trait in this game. Especially in CQC. Bounce one round and reload becomes irrelevant. Even enemy armor is less relevant since you can negate it by having all the time you want to aim.