Iirc this cannon didn’t have any anti-tank shells, correct me if I’m wrong.
From what little I know it doesn’t have ammunition for the anti-tank role but it still has armor-piercing ammunition.
2 Likes
Another silly tankette? Yes please! +1
2 Likes
-1. The gun is too weak to make the vehicle viable in any way
It will pen around 37 mm. Just like (around) the 20/65 Breda.
1 Like
The 20/65 pens 48 mm, and it’s an autocannon. That’s a massive difference.
Also where did you get that it pens 37 mm? Because it seems too high when we compare it to the 37/40 of the M11/39.
I used this. Not very accurate because I don’t know the velocity of the ammunition.
I can only tell you that it’s impossible, considering the M11/39 gets 39 mm out of a 37/40 gun.
1 Like
Yeah I know sadly.
L3 + M22 = this cute thing
Yes +1
1 Like
But with a gun worse than both. I don’t think it even pens 15 mm.
we can expect 20-25mm at most with aphe. The closest thing in game is the 37mm sa18 l21 from the fcm36 and the 47mm sa34 from the amc34. if it fires the same shell as the m11 39, then it should have 23g of explosives, and be around 0.7kg, but slower at around 400ms.
I’m not sure, but it’s possible that it fires similar ammunition.
not sure how common this is with the Italians, but for the Germans it was extremely common to reuse projectiles on guns of the same caliber
Italians also did it, but I don’t know if the 37/40 can fit in the 37/26.
projectile probably fits since it’s the same caliber, main thing you would do is change the casing. Whether or not they actually did it, though, is definitely something i don’t know.
In bot the case, the pen will be crap.
Yes, crap or not, I need that!
2 Likes
1 Like
76,37 kg of he filler?
1 Like