The FV107 Scimitar should be given thermal sights, and a laser rangefinder, since the vehicle can be equipped with both. The German Luchs A2, at BR 7.3, has thermal options; the German Wiesel 1a4, at BR 7.3, has laser rangefinder and thermal options; and the Swedish Ikv 91 has the option for a laser rangefinder.
1 Like
No it shouldn’t. The model is completely wrong for the era where Scimitar had thermal sights and LRF
3 Likes
Last time I checked neither Wiesel nor Luchs had amazing shell that can like 2-3 hit any medium tank from side and kill tanks like Leopard 1,STB-1 even some of the Patton tanks from front.
Gaijin was already moving it to 8.0, give it those and it will find it self at 8.3 making it worthless because you can just take Warrior at that point.
The scimitar in WT is a relativley early Scimitar 1, thermals were added in the later TES modifications. Hopefully (as well as the broken model being fixed) we get a Scimitar TES or Scimitar 2
3 Likes
I mean the scim 1 rn is pretty pathetic, the rarden cannon is like the only bonus about it.
Its terrain resistance is pathetic, the clip size is wrong , the turning loses so much speed as well and it barely accelerates.
Edit: why not make it like the BMP1 ? or T64B that can choose the upgrade or not even T80B has the options with the T80 kits.
Its clip size is correct, RARDEN fires in threes. everything else about it si wrong tho, it wouldn’t be so bad if it had regen steering
1 Like
The clip size is incorrect no?, the clip isnt three, its 6 but fired in a 3 burs last I checked sources for the cannons effective fire rate (however said sources which as far as im aware were secondary could be wrong) , it can be higher than it is in game?.
Much like we see, the BMP2 and BMP2M irl usually do not fire at the high rate they are used in game.
but they at least have the option.
Regardless, the rarden cannon is about the only good thing on the damn tank xD
Most the game would benefit substantially from regen steering tbh
1 Like