Yes, the threat ID tables are being correct to the symbology the RWR’s are capable of displaying.
Specific to Gripen marks, other airframes need their own reports but we can group by type for this.
Should any of the Tornado models in the game use the same RWR?
Tornados will be maintaining their full threat ID capabilities, regarding the exact unit we don’t have information on that, but the IDS marks are modelled after the British RWR from our Tornados.
So if the link can be placed with Gripen and Tornado for that I can make the case at a minimum the Gripen RWR should match the Tornado.
The closest we have so far is a link to the German Tornado.
I personally found this (i sadly don’t have access to the full journal through my uni and only get the preview):
Additional question, currently on live the JAS39C is marked as having the RWR “AR830” which is the RWR that the JAS39A used (as well as the first two batches of C), the 3’rd batch of JAS39C has the BOW-21. is the in game RWR on the C version supposed to be AR830 or is it misnamed/not known about the upgrade?
“Suggestion passed to Developers”
“BOL pods removed from the JAS39C, problem fixed”
Gaijin.
I wouldn’t even be surpised xD
Bruh…
1 Like
Hopefully gaijin implement Litening III from Tornado GR.4 instead Litening II after update dev server
For Swedish Air Force only, I think
But other operated never ordered GBU-39 SDB and GBU-49 Enhanced Paveway II
Do GR and IDS have the same RWR? I’m not sure how much they differ, but I’ve definitely come across information that they are not the same.
They are not, but only specifics of Gr RWR are known, so they are made after Gr.
Found this info:
(Ericsson Saab Avionics develops EW suite for Gripen)
(Electronic Warning System for Gripen - FMV signs contract with Saab)
(Saab wins 1 billion SEK order for Radar Warning Equipment for German Tornado aircraft)
Just gathering and collecting what i can find and posting it here if it helps some one else in their searches :)
So to sum up the thing we are doing rn.
RWR change, adding threat ID and extending it to C band.
Litening III
GBU 49
GBU 39
It seems Gaijin isn’t interested in giving Italian F-16ADF its actual missiles, since Italian community has demanded for this for quite a long time.
Although recent “passed to developers” reminded me about missiles I want more)
Maybe… Central Pylon already?
Its silly gaijin refuses stuff like this imo
Thats a feature long forgotten on the pages of time.
How are people suppose to file bug report this if most of that information is classified? Why did they need to change in the first place when Gaijin bends realism for the sake of balancing or implementation is an established doctrine in the game?
1 Like
Hey guys. We just wanted to clarify that the Gripen series currently has an older configurated RWR, the ALR-46. This is currently a known bug and we do plan to fix its configuration. Any reports with sources will also be accepted for review too.
6 Likes
@Gunjob @Necronomica I found proof that EWS-39 could be integrated without upgrading the RWR, Hungarian Defense Force Gripens continue to use the earlier RWR but have some other elements of the EWS-39 upgrade.
According to The Hungarian Military National Security Service
See page 83, translated;
Discussion of the BOL launchers I believe, still utilizing the AR830 RWR. It also appears to be discussing the possible import of multi-spectral flares.
Crisis averted.
The “data” for BOWS-21 I posted earlier was sourced from Janes though, as such cannot be used;
1 Like
Hi Smin could you clarify what is meant by this? Are you referring to the aircraft’s IRL HUD & cockpit displays?
Also do the Devs now require a complete list of threats the RWR can identify in real life? Or just proof that an RWR can identify a wide range of threats?