I hoping for the GBU-39 ^^
2 Likes
Since Smin doesnt answer my calls can you explain this nerf?
Why Gripen’s RWR cant able to identfiy threats anymore? Is it bug or historical changes with evidence.
If you’ve got some evidence for its threat ID capabilities I can forward it for sure. As for the why its happening that’s still something for a Community Manager to provide sorry.
5 Likes
I see, seems like we need some answers from Smin.
Thanks for the explanation althought its weird to assume that plane like Gripen cant identify threats considering its a very modern plane that has been purchased and still in active service on many airforces today.
Can we get an explanation for this nerf?
Is there any evidence shows that Gripen should not be able to identify threats with its RWR?
Hey.
The RWR changes are to make HUDs and RWR functionality more realistic. Threat IDs can differ between the HUD and cockpit display, so the Devs will be basing it on what each system had to offer.
Reports are always welcome for issues you believe to not be correct.
8 Likes
Hey again.
Thanks for the explanation.
Nope, and i’m sceptical we would ever find anything on it as its still classified.
But i can search through my sources to see what i can find.
4 Likes
Only thing I’ve ever found mentioning it I believe was from Janes about the BAE work on modernising Gripen A to Gripen C, which I think mentioned something about being Integrated with NATO Threat Index but 1 its Janes, and 2 I don’t even remember where I saw it.
1 Like
Thanks for the explanation, i believe both in game Gripen models should have NATO threat index considering Jas39 developed to be able to operate with other Nato countries.
3 Likes
I don’t know about the A, but C certainly should
As far as i know biggest difference between A and C model is the Nato munitions compatibility.
I doubt the Gripen C doesn’t feature a modern RWR with ThreatID capabilities in reality, but we need something like maybe a photo of the display or any kind of confirmation.
1 Like
Does this work? (Doubt it)
1 Like
It should be more than enough i believe.
I feel like ICAS is the best we will do for a source on this.
If Gunjob says yes, i’ll get to writing out a report for it.
Thats for gaijin to decide unfortunately. Look at a lot of other reports even if its accepted gaijin will probably ignore it for mo ths on end until another problem pops up.
2 Likes
I’d wait before anyone writes anything.
1 Like