Well thats gonna be a issue find
Thank you for the info
Well thats gonna be a issue find
Thank you for the info
Indeed, R-Darter is normally pictured on its own special rail;

You can also confirm compatibility by finding the Derby series on a CRL.
But the winrate isn’t just reflecting how good a vehicle is. It’s also reflecting the sim matchmaker, which is much stricter than arcade and realistic. Therefore it’s reflecting the players playing major nations (USSR) and minor nations like Sweden and the UK.
I was literally just writing that.
It has 22km range so it is on the higher end for a SRAAM.
looks like an IRIS-T without the wings…
Can you take your off topic stuff else where we don’t want it here
Appears on topic to me, I’d like to keep up with this. The MiG-29 got dogged on and was given the R-27ER almost immediately in response. Gripen has been dominating and nothing has been done so far. Weird.
I love how its not a gripen issue. its more related to the flight models of things like MIG-29 and SU-27 being dogshit.
Where does it dominating in game have anything to with technical data
Like im trying to find Derby/R darter mounted on a common launcher rail so i can say that R darter should get BOLs on the same rail
nice ill check it later
The guy in your own video says “it’s the MLD of its battle rating” lol. UFO flight models are only a problem when it’s non major nations though I guess.

Please don’t tell me you also put value in win rates?
He has a better kill death ratio in the SMT and Su-27 compared to the Gripen, but the win rates are the complete inverse. If he’s performing worse in the Gripen, but still winning matches, doesn’t that perfectly demonstrates how bad a metric win rate is? That it is entirely dependent on your team?
No one is disputing the fact that the Gripen is the best plane in the game, it’s just funny that his stats reflect the opposite whilst he cries in every Gripen thread on the forum about how brain-dead easy it is to use. As if WT is just people mindlessly dogfighting in sim.
edit:
Also disagree about the SMT - I find it pretty good, and I like using it in grb. If it got an targeting pod it would be amazing.
It’s ok in ground rb, but yes a pod would make so it much better
While the MLD performed better than peers, and still mostly does… it wasn’t due to an error in the FM causing severe overperformance.
The gripen, while performing above its’ peers… does so due to an erroneous temporary flight model pending fixes that allow unstable designs to function with instructor.
Excuse me, it’s unrelated this topic but another fighter aircraft with active radar homing BVRAAM as a researchable before JAS39C Gripen from SAAF would be Atlas Cheetah C or Cheetah D for UK tech tree ?