Yeah. This is another reason Id prefer the SAAF Gripen C (if it should even get ARH to begin with) to get AMRAAM.
Im trying to find a photo of a SAAF Gripen with BOLs and i can’t even find of it with missiles only bombs or nothing so i have no clue
+1
It would be a bit annoying if everyone else Gripen gets BOLs on the AMRAAMS and we can’t with R Darter
Like how do you prove the it can be mounted with BOLs when it was never mounted in the first place
Though I feel this is an avenue we really shouldnt explore too much, just in case they remove BOL, leaving us with less CMs than the other Gripen Cs at the same BR
Well im assuming they have the BOLs i just can’t really see them not having them
Thats why it should recieve Amraams considering Gripen C is compatible with Any Nato armament.
Yep, also after Red Tops, SRAAM and Skyflash. I have a healthy amount of paranoia when it comes to unique missiles for the British TT (/ Minor nations)
Uhhhh, Meteor???
At least Germany would get that too.
Sweden will also get it, Possibly France too.
Britain, Italy, Sweden, Germany and maybe France (I dont actually know about france)
France tested Meteor and made compatible with Rafale.
İf MICA missiles become obsolete in the future then Gaijin can add it to Rafale.
For what it’s worth I think you can see it here on the picture from my post?
BOL on the Derby
“The image shows cargo options intended for the export version to South Africa”
Just a render but still
This a render right
Well its good enough thank you
Thats only bombs im afraid
ah you’re right. I can check later, playing helldivers rn
Arrent we all :P
Yeah, very refreshing. Have not touched war thunder in like 3 weeks. I’ve honestly gotten tired of the low-flying meta in sim and tbh dealing with constant Gripen misinformation on forums took a lot of the joy out of it for me, it’s not healthy
Yep, ive been grinding the event and thats about it.