There is a really nice video from the Swedish Airforce museum where a former fighter pilot tests their JAS39E simulator that gives REALLY clear details about the MFD (timestamped to 4:35, English subtitles available).
At 5:10 the pilot selects a target and gets a gray square with info that states “UN-ID” in the center for the yellow unidentified targets.
If it’s already closed for lacking enough info - and you add info, do they open it up and give it another go then?
(Genuinely curious)
If it’s closed you can either message the Technical Moderators here on the forum and ask them to re-open it or you can use the “report” function on the bug report site to ask them to re-open it so that you can add more information.
You can find all the teams and the areas they handle listed here: (Who is who and Reporting Procedure). If you don’t get an answer within a few days you can add more moderators from the list to the original message instead of sending a new message (that way you preserve the date of the message and it doesn’t look like a new request), adding one of the moderators to the message every 2-3 days or so until you get an answer.
Please do not to add the seniors until you have tried all other regular moderators, the Seniors likely won’t answer unless they are added and pinged by the regular moderators but if you’ve added all the regular moderators with no answer then you can add the seniors.
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
still marked as accepted, no changes done yet
You guys can just copy-paste my report if you want and include the new source, I won’t go through the trouble of messaging tech mods
Messaged one of them, adding another as there’s no reply after 48h
It is Gripen. You would sooner get a reply from a morgue for tenancy than a useful response from a tech mod.
updated
updated
updated
Great, now there’s a new prescedent set by bug Mods, images now require a source.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/yEqs8mC6DsdH?comment=cRfdYioGEKLevr86z7JcKbzk
… the tablet on the image provided by author of the report was drawn using AI. […] To prevent similar incidents from recurring, unsourced photos will not be accepted,
I wonder how this would work, like say you got the image from a random photographer on instagram or something . I would assume that wouldn’t count as A secondary source, and that from now on you essentially need to have all photos taken from at least a book or something for it to be able to be used in a bug report
I had a mod tell me an image I used was fake because they couldn’t find it despite me showing the link to the photographers site with dates that haven’t been updated in years since they retired
Literally has the tag on the damn image too
Unfortunate they cant rely/trust on us being good samaritans
Nah I think the mod was just too lazy to check or blatantly missed it somehow. Weirder stuff has happened
“We believe its a marketing lie”
Best Gaijin jokes in 2025.
And that’s being generous, considering what these mods actually do.
What i’m guessing is that images must have been sourced from a publicly available online point.
Although, as you said, that ability to verify starts to break down once the pictures come from less ‘credible’ ones. What i fear is that it gives them even more leeway than just now rejecting pictures. (defaulting to needing stated numbers, or generally concrete text statements, or even just holding a report in limbo because too little images were provided)
Interesting but not shocking at all considering the times we live in. AI is a very powerful tool and nothing stops people from creating believable artificial images just to boost or nerf things in the game.
