This with AIM-120C5 I think would be possible. Keep in mind that missile pylons on the belly are ejectors, not rails so theres more space in general
yup. with ejector racks as long as weapons don’t clip they can be mounted.
here is example of dual rack r77s, the fins literally overlap but since they’re not touching its fine. therefore I think aim 120 c5 should be able to be mounted there as long as it doesn’t clip the weapons
2 Likes
Id yes or just 8 250s on the belly and have infinite cm and then 120s for days aswell
here comes 14.0+ for a downgrade missile, you guys happy now?
1 Like
It was obvious that they would not give 13.7 GrippEn
2 Likes
AIM-120C5 got nothing to do with Gripen E being 14.0 or 14.3
2 Likes
It was probably going to be 14.0+ anyway, Gripen C is 13.7 and the E gets 3 more ARH missiles, AESA radar and IRST. That has been enough on several other platforms for a BR increase.
Its 14.0 in the files btw so thats amazing
1 Like
Well, first bug i saw, the C-5’s image in the center is only two missiles but description text says 3 so it’s probably actually 3.
And yes, it’s 14.0:
(I love having fast internet <3)
2 Likes
RWR is still not spherical
Well the report hasn’t even been accepted so that one i personally expected.
updated
A shame that the MFD is still very unfinished.
Although the map screen shows the enemies tracked by the radar now.
gripen can finally multirole without having one hand tied behind its back
It was already doing it in the dev, but the scale is still incorrect.
Still a bit of a bother that the centerline is grouped in 3 instead of permitting 1 of the spice racks and an amraam or two.
does anyone know what is the reason why we cant have BOL with A2G weapons in Gripen or A2A weapons with PIDS+ in F16AM? is it purely a balancing decision or technical problem with how pylons/launchers work? or just lazy implemention?