That’s an issue across multiple hud/mfd systems with nctr. afaik, the only modeled nctr inside the cockpit is that of the typhoon’s radar mfd
SU30 also has it. Still worth reporting imo
May I suggest talismaning the JA-37C? Probably the best Swedish Plane in terms of Br placement in the game
2 Likes
Valid. I didnt think of that
F-5AG imo is better or the Mig 21 both are solid as the 10.3 downtiers are abundant
+1
honestly they need to work on the cockpit a lot more… Su30’s might have the only one that is quite close to complete. The info that you can get in its cockpit is almost unmatched even though they are slowly adding those to other planes as well.
we gotta push harder to get gripen E done!
Im slowly grinding the Gripen E with the F16AM but only using it for CAS lmao, ginna take a while, penguins are silly and bad
1 Like
updated
1 Like
Nvm I schizo’d out. Dunno why I though the Gripen E’s IRST didn’t have passive ranging.
Anyways, brochure on Skyward IRST system: https://electronics.leonardo.com/documents/16277707/18376516/Skyward+-+IR_Search_and_track_System_(MM08130)_HQ.pdf?t=1674470683070
1 Like
They indeed fixed it but clipping is still a thing. At least they know its on them not on irl capability
InB4 removed because of clipping again
Suddenly, I found a bug report that makes the Gripen look even cooler.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/w0xdSkcfcwdI
5 Likes
updated
2 Likes
and here I thought gaijin leaned to be reasonable and not add absurdly OP CAS
Imo my Su-34 plus Su-30 with KH-38MT’S i feel is more busted but thats just me and i love the silly duck face i put on my Su-34 lol
Gungnir is exciting
Is anyone else having problems with the maws not despensing chaff?
if they add that while US is stuck with only mavs, then there is no way to argue that there isnt some bias going on