The extended wings, the wrong cant on the thermal pod which lead to us needing to coreect them because they didn’t bother to see how it was actual modeled on the aircraft and the landing gear which even after the fixes gets worse each time. Thats not inclusing the MFD which is so terrible id unironically prefer the Gripen A and that thing doesn’t even have its historical MFD because gaijin put all their focus on the SAAF Gripen C when that was added.
So lets not call their slop anything other than what it is
Which it didn’t have at one point so it’s likely going to be considered an upgrade that the dev’s can choose to add or not.
That’s not a modeling issue, it’s the thermal pod not being aligned with the pylon, this is also present on all the gripens.
Aren’t they correct now? there were two fixes like a week ago. If they still aren’t correct then a new report needs to be made because i think all the reports on the landing gear has been adressed.
Which isn’t a modeling issue, but i do agree that it could use some attention and love.
Doesn’t it? i thought it did, could you show me what’s wrong with it? and is it reported?
Gripen A cockpit was reported but ignored in favor of the Gripen C because the Gripen C was priority just compare these to ingame its literally night and day lmao
Again people ask me why im so negative its because when was the last time sweden air got more attention to have equal footing like everyone else? Our own aircraft are done by some unpaid intern who spent 3 minutes and called it a day. Hell even the MLU isnt unique when its cockpit was given to everyone else. So why shouldn’t i call gaijin out for their sloppy work?
The Pylon itself has the wrong angle, which makes it clip. The pylon changed from C to E, which seems to have been overlooked in the crunch to get it out. It’s been accepted for a handful of days now
Question: does anyone know where the bidirectional nozzle for dumping/grounded refueling is?
You mean reports? Nobody cares about the Gripen A, everyone flocked to the better Gripen on launch the one that was actually getting attention from Gaijin the SAAF Gripen.
Hey @Smin1080p_WT can we get an answer to the Gripen E and what the devs planned for? Cause its clear they have no interest in an actual production Gripen E so what is the plan? Make us Grind the actual Gripen E with no differences except missiles? What is this the 5th time we’ve had to do that?
So can we expect the current Gripen to get a redone 3D model or will it get a name change to reflect its a early prototype model prior to the Gripen E entering production?
Also how is it that the devs can buff Russian aircraft but cant fix the Gripens MAWs and RWR not being Spherical?
Yeah, the cockpit also is a complete mess, missing a lot of features, cannot read anything, and the MFD map is wrongly sized so messes up with your situational awareness. There is no indication for them to solve any of these obvious problems other than marking “accepted” on the reports but please, let’s not call them sloppy :)
It would be odd that have it that far forward on the rudder in that case and i can’t personally see any place where it would come out of on the rudder.
The last two images in my previous post you can see how far forward the fuel starts to come out of the plane. Which lines up with the port i marked.
Just found this as well, i think i’m correct here.
Figured I find stuff only 39E related considering @ostgh was wondering about it.
Looks like it was moved due to the new placement of the landing gear possibly blocking the area being more within the wing. Either way is it possible to be bug reported considering Gaijin currently has the fuel dump copy and pasted from the 39A/C?
