I dont understand how this bomber is still at 9.0 in 2025 , it has no front facing guns , turrets , flares , faces supersonics as low a br as 9.3 , it cant turn , at least has a bomb site and no airspawn.
the Vautour IIN late with radar missiles and x4 AA20 nord missiles sits at 8.3 while getting an airspawn , and front facing 30mm defas while having the same top speed as the IIB. There is no competitive edge the IIB has to be at 9.0 , the same br as the yak28B that is supersonic , has chaff , a bomb sight and front facing guns. Did the devs forget about this plane?
the IIA at the same br gets front facing guns and extra rocket ordinance.
France tax
Because not enough people complain about its BR in the battle-rating threads that pop up every once in awhile.
welp, if it was me, it’s the whole French BR TT (Ground/Air/Helicopters) that should be revamped.
They forgor
Yak-28 and Su-7 are under-BR’d.
10.0 should be 10.3.
sending flareless planes into all aspect missile lobbies is just asking for them to be useless and never played
I’m glad you get my point.
some aircrafts would have a word:
Mirage 5F
F-8E(FN)
Mirage IIIC
J-35D
F-104J
F-1 (Mitsubishi)
…
If anything, it’s ALL-aspect, slow speed carriers that are too low in BR. (namely A-10A’s, A-6’s, Su-25’s Alphajet TH)
At least when it had airspawn, you could have a base, now all supersonic or airspawn bombers are getting them before you. And most of the time you get obliterated by a supersonic afterburner fighter while you wait an atrocious amount of time for the base to respawn.