Russian top tier tanks need a fair buff

Which again is incorrect irregardless of why the EF2000 for Germany didn’t mount brim 1.
So it realistically shouldn’t have had them.

what reasoning is that.
Because as far as I have seen Gaijin haven’t actually given an official statement as to why the EF2000 got the brims it never mounted IRL.
There was genuinely zero response or acknowledgement from them.

We knew it couldn’t mount them as germany only orded them with the Brim 3.
Yet there it was with them.

This is a huge possibility of and I don’t mean in game I mean IRL of a functional “high” mobility reverse gear on a T90 series MBT. Though I’m sceptical myself it isn’t as if Russia have never designed more mobile capable transmissions is it.

Yet you are okay with a EF2000 having brimstones it historically never had ?

I personally would like to see more information before actually condeming it or advocating for it.

Which munitions? AGM-84H/K?

We still don’t know if it’s actually coming and it’s still worse overall than the Kh38MT since it’s subsonic.

4 Likes

Subsonic sure, but combined overall will be good.

Subsonic means its going to be fairly easy to intecept with any SACLOS SPAA.

Add the fact its going to be limited in quantity, and you got a glorified Maverick. It will hardly solve anything unless its RCS is tuned for the task.

With the new pantsir coming? that will have a field day and the easiest time shooting down these SLAM-ERs.

Not to mention I think the Super Hornet can only carry 2-4 of them right? I don’t even know if Gaijin would give it to the F-15E and/or F-16C.

5 Likes

Gajin doesnt care about what planes historically mounted they just care if theres proof that it can mount stuff and since they treat all EFTs the same it doesnt matter if German EFTs mounted Brims.

Im personally not a fan of treating all EFTs the same and id much rather give them some uniqueness depending on tech tree and id like to prevent the balancing nightmare that an EFT with ASRAAM and IRIS T would be. However thats how Gaijin rolls rn.
The reverse gear is not even remotely the same. Were not talking about whether the tank had it historically were talking about whether it exists in the first place. A more fitting analogy would be giving the EFTs thrust vectoring

And im condemning its addition until theres actually any information about it, which shouldnt be a hot take at all.

2 Likes

They made it take longer to repair and reload the 30mms after the belts are detonated, but they haven’t made it easier.
If anything, you can no longer kill it when it is hull-down via 30mm belt detonation.

Tho i did it years ago when missiles were still capable of hitting targets at long ranges, i remember hitting a F-4J with the R-27ER of the Su-27 at 72km.
He was flying straight to me at low altitude but not low enough to fool it.

did it ever occur that maybe, these tanks resemble their real life counter parts. And truly are just bad.

2 Likes

I’ll post clips tomorrow, but you actually can, however it’s entirely rng and quite rare. I don’t know what they broke to make this happen, or if it was intentional.

The lower half or the upper half of the 30mm belts?
From what I understand the upper half of the 30mm, when detonated, is impossible to cause vehicle destruction, whereas the lower half can.

Yes, apparently russia figured out the portal tech and thus there is no direct connection between “outside” and “internal” belt and as such no chain detonation can occur.

Just shows how rest of the world is just stuck in the middle ages when it comes to technology.

9 Likes

It’s just gaijin digging up the ancient Hyperborea technology to fight the lizard people from ‘acceptable sources’, nothing to make a fuss about, definitely not Russian bias.

I dont know how many times someone needs to say it but whatever you see coming out of RU today, its nothing they JUST invented…its been there for at least 40 years… the fall of the Union is the reason why the west overtook them and only recently RU started catching up

1 Like

They weren’t the same though hence why it had to be integrated with brim 3.

I mean it would also give distinct differences in platforms which would be smarter, oppose to they’re all the same

Fair enough, however as i said I’m waiting to see more evidence on it.
You do realise though the soviet union was working on many prototype vehicles and transmissions.

Which ofc would likely be where this idea came from, same as T14 Armata it has a faster reverse speed as well.

I’m not saying it should be added with the limited information given.

Not my clips but I’ll do some controlled testing later today.

Spoiler


Yes german EFTs needed brim 3 integration but in the game they are functionally the same as UK EFTs.

So? I dont think that anyones is doubting that russia would be able to make a not sucking transmission in the 21st century but that still leaves the question whether such a transmission was ever fitted to a vehicle that we have (or could have) in game.

great then we are in agreement

lol

1 Like

You are very welcome to live in your imaginary bubble of dominance but thats not the case in reality…both sides were better than the other in certain areas and that is just a fact whether you like it or not

Edit: conveniently ignores the 30+ year old video of the T80UD with a better transmission because it doesnt fit into the narrative, nice

1 Like

a cat with the words is this ragebait written above it

yeah in certain areas but in general the developmental gap between the 2 became smaller until the mid 70s when it widened again and then completely ripped apart after the fall. The ussr never was an equal to the west outside of some specific areas. And describing russia as catching up is laughable.

Because its the same as the other video. Entirely useless for the discussion or do you think that building a transmission faster than 4kmh is a remarkable achievement?