I converted it to truth for you. No need to thank me.
1 Like
T90M is literally the tank I EXCLUSIVELY hold W, because it just tanks so much that no other tank would get away with. Why do you think BMPT is OP? Because it has the same hull. Imagine if it was vulnerable like t72.
1 Like
"Ofc other tanks need to aim carefully, at tiny spots. Where we can hit big spots and thus need to aim far less carefully. This is not an advantage, at all. And what do you mean some of our weakspots are covered by magic spall eating fuel tanks that turn them into not so weak spots?
Not exactly. I’d put it this way: if you can’t deal with something strong, you just join it.
IF you wanna kill T90M from the front you aim for the LFP or the drivers port. If you want to kill Abrams, you go for the turret ring from the front, same with Leopard…all those are TINY weakspots which are absolutely unrealistic to hit in a real world consecutively shot after shot…
iirc 3BM60 pens some(?) abrams hull front?
So your solution to OP things isnt to properly balance things but just play the OP things?
Because not everyone wants to put in months of research into a tree that’s top tier competitiveness is entirely dependent on Gaijins good will
You do realize on height differences you’re basically negating the effectiveness of armor on ufp right?
Not to mention driver port is universal weakspot across all MBT’s.
Yours isn’t even an argument from the beginning.
Gotta love soviet mains when people call out thier OP stuff
5 Likes
They are delusional… oh look their missiles loft as they should while hellfires/jagms don’t <— russian main response “it is fine”
Unrealistic missiles in game… best CAS <… russian main " it is okay don’t see problem"
Like how blind people are to not see obivous things happening in this game in favor of CCCP or russkies in this game? How they think it is ok? Just how?
3 Likes
Wait since when do Hellfires/JAGMS dont loft?
KH38MT needs to be removed from the game completely, thats just a known fact for a long time now…
Hellfire/JAGM’s, SPIKE,PARS,BA-11,CM-502KG doesnt loft as they should be.
At longer ranges they should have a near identical flight path to the LMUR, its been reported for Hellfire, Spike and PARS for years and years.
But even the new JAGM-MR has the exact same flight path as the Hellfire and this often results in a flat impact point rather than a top down, guranteeing it always hits ERA
1 Like
Quite sure Hellfire did loft in the beginning? But Hellfire having flatter trajectory isnt inherently wrong since Hellfire does have a few different modes in which it fires the missile. Obviously in this case this is used as a nerf…
I wish I would face idiots that can’t kill me in 6-7 shots when I was spading my T-90M about a year ago, would have made playing it a lot less frustrating (I never touched it again after getting all the important mods).
3 Likes
Honestly it surprised me too the last few days… Usually when I am playing RU I get depressed into oblivion and leave the game entirely but these past few days Ive been playing to unlock the BUK, people seem to shoot for shts somehow…not everyone ofc but much more often than it used to be
1 Like
People tend to think that the autoloader module and the ammunition take up the same exact space. So when they hit one, they think the other must also have been hit.
That’s just not how it works. The ammunition takes up a far smaller amount of volume than the autoloader does.
The carousel doesn’t soak up any more damage than a turret basket on a Leo 2 or M1 Abrams does.
??
On average, Russian MBT’s tend to have sub-par mobility:
Strv 122’s be like:
-
Leclerc, Type 10, Type 90 and PT16/T-14 all use autoloaders as well.
-
The Abrams, Leopard 2, Merkava, Ariete and Challenger 2 only suffer reduced reload times when 2 crew have been knocked out.
If a Russian MBT has also suffered 2 dead crew, they’re looking at the respawn screen. -
Autoloaders are now destructible modules, I’ll take a 11 second reload over a non-functional reload any day.
For the sake of comedy: Feel free to continue!
7 Likes
Germany
i mean, Apaches compensate their bad FnF ATGMs with bigger amounts of them.
could like to see other nations getting OP missiles like the Kh-38MT, i prefer skill over OP toys so if NATO mains stop crying about russian CAS then go on add OP NATO missiles so everything is fair for all.
AGM-65B sucks compared to Kh-38MT and i have tested both, and not a single Maverick has the anti-tank capability of the absurdly good Kh-38.
Russia is fine.
they have bad tanks, just 2 useful, and everything else is mid/good (maybe OP).
T-90M has bad reverse, T-80BVM has less armor, Pantsir is a very good SPAA, BUK also a good SPAA but lacks “anti-multipath” capabilities like IRIS-T, Mi-28NM is OP, Su-34/30SM2 are good and maybe OP.