Matter of fact, T-14 will be a lot worse than people expect it to be, I’m placing my bets in the T-15 if Gaijin ever considers adding next-generation tanks to the game (except and never including modernization). It’s a 2S38 on steroids I mean, armor exclusively at the front, crew in a specific spot, ammo in the other, and engine right in the back.
At this moment Terminator has no place to be balanced, the firepower difference from battle rating 11.3 to battle rating 12.7 is minimal, if not, not a single change.
If Gaijin ever considered putting the Soderma modification as a literal improvement of the vehicle not just thermal imaging device I don’t think it will go further than battle rating 9.3 except in cases of decompression, while BMDs do have this possibility.
X vehicle will be better if you use Y (technically worse) vehicle in comparison, I personally don’t think Buk-M3 is one of the best, but surely is effective, HQ-11 despite having shorter range should perform a lot better specially since the launcher is fully elevated.
Z-10ME with BA-11 should be performing similarly in my opinion, and given that it doesn’t need to use all the pylons to impact the battlefield, which also Mi-28NM should be worse, there are no pictures of it loading up to 8x LMUR, only 4x LMUR in the great majority of the cases, others only 2x LMUR.
2 Likes
come back after actually playing high tier with other nations
+1
so the BMP3 and BMD4 that you are claiming are better than the CV90s and nato ifvs?
2 Likes
Caer has both played more games and does better on average than you.
6 Likes
I am pulling decent stats and MORE than often carry with my disadvantages. So imagine if I was playing a nation that had actually good tanks lol.
Feel free to prove us wrong :)
1 Like
“The grass is always greener on the other side” I think I once read from another Russian player writing while trying to argue on a blufor-based topic whining over Russian tanks.
Its always this annoying back and forth where someone suffers and the other explicitly tells them they’re not.
1 Like
Doesn’t make him “better” in a game like War Thunder. Check the nations he’s played maybe huh
Being comparatively better to you does not make him better than you. Aight.
It’s not a fair comparison. Your incapability to understand that tells me everything about you and all of your arguments.
Then educate all of us. Why is not a fair comparison? :)
Because the game is clearly unbalanced and we’re literally all aware of it. Simple stuff bro.
It’s like talking about who’s better in MOBA games like Dota2 and League of Legends but they play different roles and different characters.
Damn, you three need to chill out with the personal attacks and stats shaming…
1 Like
Necrons is the one saying that, and calling him a Russian player certainly is a take.
However, to me grass do be tastier once you don’t waste mobility carrying armour in the hope the bozos you’re fighting shoot at it instead of a weakspot…
3 Likes
bloody hell ive almost done 8000 matches
Not fake, tho. Has the vehicles, the stats, and is always into topics holding the fort on basically saying Russia suffers without properly saying it.
And for the record, he’s just a more polished Alvis.
Where I play Russia, it does, and that’s literally just top tier tanks.
For the record I think 9.3 Russia is good.
Not entirely accurate to determine player skill, but yet not entirely useless. Also pointless and off-topic, regardless: The SR1 and Comparative rating takes a lot more in consideration for the average position, points and score than it does from actual kill/death ratio which is more clear to give away information about skill, you should’ve attached detailed information rather than incomplete.
But clearly theres no consensus on how the game is inbalanced.
right and to accuratey compare vehicle performacne youd need player to be playing different nations at the same BR…which you havent done as well.
you only played top tier russia.
