Im grinding M1A2 Trophy, man the Abrams is really good now, and the American teams is completely opposite of 4 6 months ago, but one vehicle that i really like is M1A1 and M1A2SEP, i gonna put these two on my list with Leopard 2A7, Leclercs T90M and T80BVM, and all T series overall i really like them
But we still have people saying that the “Abrams is trash” not played to much but i likte it, i am a mediocre player but i think it’s a good start im US
1 Like
I have the Olifant Mk.2, TTD, Vickers Mk.7 and AUS SEPv3 all ready to buy for the next sale, but I have this suspicion that they’ll add the Arjun this update. So I don’t want to get cucked by that.
Something something “if you die to a 2A5/2A6/PSO in a T-90M that is a skill issue” remember?
Yeah, I wish the overal casual playerbase was better in general. Game would be much more fun if you could actually rely on more than 5 of your teammates on average.
I’m biased since I love the SEPv3 both irl and in game, and the Australian camo is so good looking. However both are pretty fun so for the vehicles alone there really isn’t a wrong choice.
Only possible one that could maybe have “good” players a baseline is Israel, and even that’s pushing it with what I saw grinding that tree.
2 Likes
please i swear to god i do NOT want to have to grind through that pitiful excuse of an MBT just to get to the AUS SEPv3
2 Likes
100% agreed, which is exactly why I’m considering just buying the Olifant, TTD, Vickers and M1A2 this week to not leave anything to chance.
An early Arjun might be somewhat okay if they can put it at 9.7 between the Olifant and TTD, but a later one that I expect them to be put between the Vickers Mk.7 and M1A2 seems really painful.
iirc, the 105 dart they made is like, on the worse end of 105 darts and then the 120mm dart is on DM33 levels
cooking up an actual 10.7 eqv for a “modern MBT”
2 Likes
I use either Sepv3 or Sepv1 as first respawn depending if I need Sepv1 extra mobility or not. Trophy as second respawn when usually helis appear and Sepv2 as last-last measure. It would be nice to get updated damage models for all of them tho
Okay but consider the Penetration cum Blast shell that would probably be like APHE and come with the Arjun
It would be extremely funny to see the shell name in the kill feed and a bonus if it’s actually decent (like more than 240mm penetration and above 1000m/s mv)
Tbh Leopards are my favorite tanks in real life and Abrams comes second but Japan top tier on these days feels like lacking something.
No proper light vehicle, No working top tier Spaa, half baked Type-10’s feels lacking.
I do like playing with them but shortcomings are really became noticeable, on other hand British line-up is actually quite solid with Black Night/2E and the addition of Sep V3.
2 Likes
Yeah, it’s either hit or miss.
One match Russians plays like vegetable on my side next match they act like defending Stalingrad against me.
1 Like
I wanted to grind the Vikhrs for the MI-35P, but jesus Russia 11.7 is actually tragic, i can’t deal with this.
Without their CAS, which all sits at 13.0, they are an absolute nothing burger.
Su25T’s actually causing havoc on that br range despite its shortcomes.
1 Like
Yea its pretty good, unfortunately it’s obviously mostly uptiers and you face top dog SPAA a lot.
Yeah at 12.7 you got no chance against them unless they are afk.
I mean, did anyone need to play BMPT on release to say BMPT on release had comically low BR?
Just saying, some things about vehicles can be observed even without having to play said vehicle.
I dont agree with the guy you were responding to, just saying.
You see if discussion is about Russian vehicles you have to play with them in order to make comments.
The thing is even if you play with them and make similiar claims they will still find a way to deny it.
1 Like
I was referring to the current state of the T-90M, given that’s the vehicle Renzo had quoted.
If I got a euro every time I saw someone overrating the T-90M whilst not having played it themselves I could order a great Italian Pizza once every week.
2 Likes
I know, I was giving example for the logic, not contesting T-90.
Difference there is that it’s an exception to the rule
Some vehicles are so blatantly op that you genuinely don’t need to use it to see how stupid it is
If you see a vehicle that performs close enough to the average, you better need some form of experience using it to be able to form a good opinion on it since stats can’t show a thing clearly.
If a vehicle suddenly performs 2-3x the average (BMPT, PUMA on release), then you dont need experience using it to say that it’s op.
But experience is probably ideal if you want to explain why it is op and how it should ideally be balanced
2 Likes