its smaller than aster 30 ?
Yes, but hell of a lot faster
Literally anyone that isn’t a Russian player
7 Likes
You forgot the absolutely broken 7.0 lineup, 8.0, 8.3, etc
but this vehicle not researcable… only old players have this…
2 Likes
Best F&F is AGM-179.
Best air to ground weapons for safety is GNSS which is all tech trees.
Best AA is Italy, Soviets, Germany, Britain, France, and to a lesser extent USA.
Top 5 MBTs are in Italy, USA, Germany, Sweden, and France.
Even Japan and China run better MBTs than Soviets.
Soviets are slightly behind NATO right now.
On-par SPAA, slightly weaker MBTs for the meta, on-par fixed wing CAS, slightly weaker helicopter CAS though helicopters in good hands are doing things right now I believe, and weaker top light tanks than Sweden, Italy, China, and USA.
this is a joke?:D
Facts are never jokes.
Soviets aren’t weak, but no tech tree is.
Things have just been powercrept to slightly above T-90M since 2019 [Leopard 2A5’s introduction into War Thunder].
Italy, France, Germany, and Sweden have Leopard 2A5+ tanks.
USA has Abrams.
Italy also has 5.3 second reloading DM53 slinging Arietes.
Type 10, VT4A1, ZTZ99A, and WZ1001 are at minimum on-par with Soviet options. All of these will become more powerful than Soviet options as time goes on, as if and when Gaijin fixes tank agility, Soviets will get hit the hardest.
USA has HSTVL, Sweden CV90120, China VT-5, and Italy Centauro 120.
Soviets have Sprut-M which to be amphibious needs to be massive and the most thinly armored of all light tanks. It’s as tall as Centauro 120 without the benefits of Centauro 120.
All new SPAA in 6 tech trees can defeat top CAS firing anything other than GNSS weapons from behind mountains.
AH-64E has the overall best kit of the LDIRCM helicopters, and that protection will not exist for long.
8.0 US is hardly broken, it’s just decent/good.
8.3 US is very similar to 8.3 USSR: one super strong/borderline broken vehicle with mostly decent vehicles besides that as filler.
I mean, it could matter to you but both result in altered vehicles for balance.
My guy, even if Rafale had a single game in GRB and made a single kill with it’s overperforming AGM, it would already be a problem.
I don’t excuse things just because they aren’t topping the play charts.
1 Like
Guys i am too lazy to deal with this can someone else argue with this man
Yes but they are not the same thing as you claimed earlier, because the way to the intended target is different.
I never said anything against that. I just said that your claim that Rafales popularity increase is because of fictional stats is unfounded, because its popular in Air rb where the hammers dont matter
Best to agree to disagree on this one.
It’s hardly unfounded.
Rafale getting 2nd best AGM definitely brings out more players in GRB than if it had some crappy missile with 1.5km of lock range.
Thats the point. It doesnt, French ground barely moved in popularity from July to August while the Rafales playrate doubled. Dont get me wrong i fully agree that the Rafale is broken, the Hammers need a good look by Gaijin and the constant buffs while everyone else fights for scraps are unfair. But fictional stats are not the reason for Rafales popularity, favoritism and MICAs are.
Looks like you have a magic ball and can predict what would happen if Hammers were much worse than they are now ? Do you not understand this nerf would place IR Hammer in line with some 10.0 AGMs and make them barely useful at 13.0 ?
I dont need a magic ball. I can see that the Rafales (and by extension Mirage F1C 200s) popularity is completely disconnected from Frances ground popularity therefore deducing that Rafales popularity is not based on its performance in ground but on its overperformance in Air Rb where the hammers dont matter making your inital argument about Rafales popularity stemming from fictional stats very unlikely.
1 Like
If it was Russian it would be 3.3 (joke)
Rafale being popular is a mix of favoritism and fiction. Spot the keyword here.
IR Hammer having awful, almost comical seeker would reduce the play count of Rafale in GRB, which is a pretty obvious thing to state.
It’d also come with a bunch of bias threads calling out fiction.
1 Like