Its true though.
Germany has one of if not the best 6.7 lineups in the game
Yet the winrate is one of the worst?
The vehicles are not to blame
1 Like
Its true though.
Germany has one of if not the best 6.7 lineups in the game
Yet the winrate is one of the worst?
The vehicles are not to blame
It’s because the russian counterparts are just better. It’s all about relative performance.
Hot take → germany suffers at 6.0 and 6.7, their vehicles are easily killable, on the contrary of russian heavy tanks, for example (same thing happens at top tier btw, thus the bad german winrates there).
Also, cannot say as soon as you play a specific nation, you either turn completely braindead, or completely smart. It has like, no sense at all. Most people play Russia AND Germany at the same time. You’re telling be when they play Germany, they turn stupid, but when they play Russia, they turn smart ? Ridiculous, it’s the same person behind the monitor man
it just a known fact ppl that play germany, only do so bcs TIGER INVINCIBLE and dont know how to actualy play the game
1 Like
What?
Russian 6.7 tanks either are mid or suck.
No way you think something like the IS-2 is on par with a tiger 2 lmao
Cause losing Tiger 2 heavy tanks to one 40mm Aphe shot throught he turret makes it op? GRB sky is always overcrowded by Yak-9k’s looking for big things to snipe. That turret ammo storage makes this lineup a nightmare to play.
Right
thats more of the issue of the 40mm API having more HE filler then 120 APHE
And it’s also a well known fact most people playing Russia are just USSR Ivan fanbois thinking Russia is the invincible goat. What’s your point ?
Why german people thinking that are braindead, while russian people thinking the same thing have very high winrates ?
So, you’re just gonna ignore how German winrate is worse despite them having the better vehicles.
Just avoiding the actual topic
1 Like
Hot take : it is.
Very powerful shells, very trolly turrets and hulls, which can bounce german shells easily.
On Germany side → very flat turrets and hulls, easy to pen. Same with US stuff, their vehicles aren’t that bouncy
Russian stuff are just artificially buffed in their modeling, I’ve said that for years. It’s not normal you bounce a t34 turret if you shoot 3mm next to the “flat” part of their turret (where their mg is), because the game considers it is a “round” armor and thus bounces easily. I call that an artificially buff
They don’t have the better vehicles, that’s the point
From 6.0 to 12.7, counting 7.3 as well, they don’t have the better vehicles. Russia has
Powerful shells, ok meanwhile they’re stuck on 20sec reload.
Russian armour is literal paper to German guns, the long 88 is the best gun of the bracket.
You genuinely shouldn’t be struggling to kill things with the German gun.
It is normal, this applies to quite literally every, single, tank, in the game.
It’s what causes your shell to sometimes do nothing when you hit a tank’s side armour.
You shot the track which ends up being 300m thick from the shell’s pov or the flat part above the tracks which ends up being thicker.
1 Like
German 6.0 is better than Russian 6.0,
Germany doesn’t have a 7.3 lineup
Germany is better at 9.3 (Kpz 70 is the best 9.3 tank in the game), 9.7, 10.0, 10.7, and tanks-wise, 12.3 till 13.0.
Leopard 2 > literally any T-series at the same br
The best players in the game will tell you my last point is true, go ask them if you don’t believe me
1 Like
Powerful shells, ok meanwhile they’re stuck on 20sec reload.
Nothing prevent them from just defending positions, instead of pushing like idiots. They win that way at mid tier
You genuinely shouldn’t be struggling to kill things with the German gun.
With a trolly angle, even a long 88 can bounce a t34 turret you know. The angles are broken in favor of russian vehicles in this game
It’s what causes your shell to sometimes do nothing when you hit a tank’s side armour.
You shot the track which ends up being 300m thick from the shell’s pov or the flat part above the tracks which ends up being thicker.
Quite conveniently most likely happens in 80% of the cases to russian MBTs only. NATO MBTs side armors are very flat.
In mid tiers, Germany and the US have very flat hulls and turrets. It’s only the Russians that have those weird trolly angles.
Russian side armour is also flat, your point here is exceptionally dumb.
You can, angle armour in German tanks?
Have you ever played a tiger 1?
This game promotes more aggressive gameplay, this means being able to shoot on the move, good gun handling and fast reloads as well as solid mobility.
Russia does not meet most of these criteria
1 Like
An L3 can bounce apfsds if you hit the right spot.
Your argument here is still dumb.
You shouldn’t be struggling to kill something you one-tap by just shooting centre mass.
1 Like
German 6.0 is better than Russian 6.0,
No.
Germany doesn’t have a 7.3 lineup
The US has, and Russia dominates 7.3-7.7 in that mater.
Germany is better at 9.3 (Kpz 70 is the best 9.3 tank in the game), 9.7, 10.0, 10.7, and tanks-wise, 12.3 till 13.0.
Germany as well as the US have strong lineups at 9.0-10.0, but that’s about it.
10.7, 12.3, 13.0 are literally dominated by Russia. Kidding saying Germany dominates at these BRs ? Lmao.
Leopard 2 > literally any T-series at the same br
2A4 sucks, its hull is weak. 2A5/6 suck as well, for the same reason. Russian counterparts are better.
2A7 is the only one competitive against a BVM or 90M
Dont put words into my mouth.
You have good gun handling, solid reload and solid round with good mobility.
This makes it better than any T-series equivalent at the same br
You have good turret armour, good gun handling, the BEST round out of all top tier tanks and better or on par reload with Russians. Better mobility.
Makes all of these tanks better
T-90 is trash, only good side is armour, T-80bvm has ok mobility, bad reload when using its best round, which is an average round performance wise, T-80 armour is also Garbo.
Abrams beats T-80 AND T-90, due to mobility, the best firepower out of all top tier tanks, and good reload
Your only argument for why something is worse is that they have “worse” armour.
Your logic here is incredibly flawed, there are more qualities to a vehicle that matter.
If you don’t believe me, go ask some of the best top tier ground players in the game
Russian side armour is also flat, your point here is exceptionally dumb.
No, because they bounced easily.
Beside, they have those russian ERAs eating DARTs and ATGMs, so there is that.
You can, angle armour in German tanks?
Have you ever played a tiger 1?
You don’t need to angle a russian mid tier tank.
And if you do, you have way better chances to bounce.
This game promotes more aggressive gameplay, this means being able to shoot on the move, good gun handling and fast reloads as well as solid mobility.
Russia does not meet most of these criteria
And that’s why NATO having IFVs which cannot shoot atgms on the move (+ the time needed to deploy the launchers) loose more often at top tier.
Thank you for telling me I’m right.
An L3 can bounce apfsds if you hit the right spot.
Your argument here is still dumb.
A t-34 can move its turret just a little bit, and you’ll still bounce if you aim at its cheeks. Everybody know and experienced that.
11m8s. It illustrates well the problem. Very bouncy.
Russian tanks cannot angle long 88.
They don’t bounce easily, you just are taking bad shots.
Now apply that exact same logic, to medium and heavy tanks. Which is what I was talking about in my original point.
Stop changing the subject
1 Like