BUK M3 is bad, no amount of cope can change that, it’s slow, sluggish and misses most of its shots.
Beside, my W/R with russia is still abyssimal (not that it ever was high), this is just a new cope as nothing on the ground has been changed.
But you do you and cry out russian bias
Same as the chinese and american one? Beside the IRIS-T can engage incoming ammunition better than any other SPAA (pantsir included), so whats your excuse.
Patriot has 2 types of missiles: PAC-1 and PAC-2 which are SARH, but I doubt PAC-1 would be added since it would just be obsolete, and PAC-3 which is ARH, patriot can trake both SARH and ARH on one launcher

The green containers have PAC-2 in them while yellow ones have PAC-3
i think they will skip to PAC - 3 CRI and PAC - 3 MSE and do the same with s300/400 (skip to arh variants) but idk how they will balance some of the missiles used by the s400.
I mean almost all of the SPAA from the last update except for the SLM are already powercreeped and outdated lol.
They can add David’s sling for USA and Israel, since it has 300 km range
Also I hope they add ability to have both pac 2 and pac 3
any idea on how big david’s sling is ? i have a feel that gaijin is gonna butcher its performance if its a small missile. PAC 2 n 40n6 are massive and they weigh around 900kg (pac 2) , 1900kg (40n6)
its smaller than aster 30 ?
Yes, but hell of a lot faster
Literally anyone that isn’t a Russian player

You forgot the absolutely broken 7.0 lineup, 8.0, 8.3, etc
but this vehicle not researcable… only old players have this…
Best F&F is AGM-179.
Best air to ground weapons for safety is GNSS which is all tech trees.
Best AA is Italy, Soviets, Germany, Britain, France, and to a lesser extent USA.
Top 5 MBTs are in Italy, USA, Germany, Sweden, and France.
Even Japan and China run better MBTs than Soviets.
Soviets are slightly behind NATO right now.
On-par SPAA, slightly weaker MBTs for the meta, on-par fixed wing CAS, slightly weaker helicopter CAS though helicopters in good hands are doing things right now I believe, and weaker top light tanks than Sweden, Italy, China, and USA.
this is a joke?:D
Facts are never jokes.
Soviets aren’t weak, but no tech tree is.
Things have just been powercrept to slightly above T-90M since 2019 [Leopard 2A5’s introduction into War Thunder].
Italy, France, Germany, and Sweden have Leopard 2A5+ tanks.
USA has Abrams.
Italy also has 5.3 second reloading DM53 slinging Arietes.
Type 10, VT4A1, ZTZ99A, and WZ1001 are at minimum on-par with Soviet options. All of these will become more powerful than Soviet options as time goes on, as if and when Gaijin fixes tank agility, Soviets will get hit the hardest.
USA has HSTVL, Sweden CV90120, China VT-5, and Italy Centauro 120.
Soviets have Sprut-M which to be amphibious needs to be massive and the most thinly armored of all light tanks. It’s as tall as Centauro 120 without the benefits of Centauro 120.
All new SPAA in 6 tech trees can defeat top CAS firing anything other than GNSS weapons from behind mountains.
AH-64E has the overall best kit of the LDIRCM helicopters, and that protection will not exist for long.
8.0 US is hardly broken, it’s just decent/good.
8.3 US is very similar to 8.3 USSR: one super strong/borderline broken vehicle with mostly decent vehicles besides that as filler.
I mean, it could matter to you but both result in altered vehicles for balance.
My guy, even if Rafale had a single game in GRB and made a single kill with it’s overperforming AGM, it would already be a problem.
I don’t excuse things just because they aren’t topping the play charts.
Guys i am too lazy to deal with this can someone else argue with this man

