Its 2 br steps higher, ofc it gets better armament. But it comes with a price that there is a chance to face some scary stuff. Slamraam, chinese counter strike / south america 5, crotale, elde98.
Also its paid so to play it I would have to put money into disk drive or grind su25t from zero.
And another reason why I would play this over su39 is because I already own dollar store su39:
It is my first high tier cas jet. I played 500 battles on it so I can say Im fed up with frogfoots.
Also its always fun to bomb those guys who bought bmpts or grinded arenas thinking they are invincible. Su25bm almost never gets such opportunity.
If its case (I dont really think engines can get cold enough in 10-30s) and you dont want to risk, you can wait till they start taking off and strike them. Yes they can sit there indefinitely but in this case you will still fulfil your duty because they cannot harm your team anymore.
1 Like
If you can intercept an enemy in 10-30 seconds he shouldn’t land from the beginning assuming he’s somewhat decent and noticed bein trailed.
No objection about that since that’s best way to deal with enemy airplane if they already landed.
1 Like
I absolutely can’t believe that such a thing never happened to you guys
Your precise shooting Russia ammunition , but it didn’t explode
3 Likes
Its alright, theyre gonna add the dragoon to take care of the BMPT…oh and the UA BTR3e1, Surely lightly armored auto cannon vehicles can combat a dual 30mm/4 missile bolstering heavy armored tank support platform.
Today first game . This thing what happened for me
I really have no idea how to destroy Russian tanks. Many times, even if we shoot at their gun barrels or shoot their ammunition, it doesn’t work at all
Countless times…
1 Like
Go for the turret roof and gunners optic area. They are pretty easy to hit and are more consistent than shooting around the gun barrel on the T-72s and T-80s.
Added bonus is that this weak spot is not that popular yet, so a lot of T-series players don’t take it into account yet.
6 Likes
Cope harder… you have proof it is not so just stop man defending a lost cause…
DO THEY GET VIOLATED BY MACH 2 MISSILES FROM 30 KM AWAY?
Like previosuly mach 2 missiles vs slow mavericks or brimmstones which are laser guided just man stop acting dumb…
compared to LMURS? not even half as effective…
still better then adats or ito… and now you get mini pantsir which is even more insane…
the problem is also with you being blind as hell to the fact that russian ERA armor eats apfsds which is insane same with additional trunions on barrels etc… compare the size of weakspots on t72 vs abrams you can penetrate an abrams anywhere but the cheeks…
Thats why I like T-90M so much.
Unlike cheap ERA upgrades you can find on those 72/80’s it actually offers real protection even without ERA, not to mention spall liners and external fuel tanks offers additional survivability.
1 Like
I would say Russian tanks rely on their CAS rather than on armor, because it doesn’t save them, except from people who don’t know where to shoot.
4 Likes
I can say both, the armour gave them enough survivable time to get enough SP to spawn CAS. Unless they intend to scout/assist for SP to spawn CAS
By the time they did the thing, the match is mostly over.
I like how you show an under-BR’d American light tank.
120S, M60 AMBT, M10 Booker, etc all counter BMPT quite easily. And it’s even easier with America’s 11.3 options.
Also if BMPT is hiding behind something, that means they can be flanked.
obviously he always wants every advantage, even when he already has most
1 Like
Unrelated but i would like to point out that the M10 is only 10.7 while the VT5 is 11.7, even when they’re quite similar imo
2 Likes
That is subjective opinion. Yes the flight-path is incorrect but you have 16 of them and the sheer amount make them effective against MBT’s/SAM’s.
Better for intecepting (simultaneously) multiple incoming munitions… for everything else they’re pritty much the same.
I agree, the new Pantsier was not needed at this point.
You can penetrate T72s even on the cheeks…
Not exactly. The textbook sources of M1/Leo2 are also not quite up to date, and more “modern” info comes from mostly advertising materials
So? Just like i said, we dont have first hand info about protection of NATO machinery, as NATO protection levels only come in form of either old open info or advertisment.
Yet when thou come and call for “protection overperforming”, its always some, again, NATO-provided info about physical testings of armor with photos and videos. Which, by the claims, differ from the samely outdated USSR textbooks.
But when it comes for “up nato protection”, you again claim the advertisment/textbooks.
Thats what is referred, not that “there are no info about ussr protection under pressure”, but to be fair is exact opposite of that.
Why, can. But thats the problem - when USSR is modelled with docs, you claim “op overperform”. And then push to make NATO by docs, not by real performance (because there are no real evidence of performance)
Basically it. USSR stops being good closely to 9.3
Sure is! But USSR doesnt have any 35mm cannons.
You didnt hit the ammunition tho.
huh? I wonder when you people would obtain some digniy to talk without offends. I stated the fact, devs do believe its like so. Its not up to me to decide “hey they have proof make it other way”.
They get violated by 16 JAGMs being deployed to 4 teammates within 16 seconds
Quite like so. Well it was balanced when SPAA was to “guide” the rocket to kill the plane which had 4 to 6 FNF “slow” mavericks wasnt it? Why is it unbalanced now all of a sudden?
I also see 3 replies but also noticed two… Help me find third one >~<
1 Like
That’s cool, 100€ vs 300k RP