When did I write such thing?
Regardless… it works and its not just A2G munitions, IR AoA missiles to… the engines dont look off that quick and the heat is higher then the surrounding…
Air to air missile does the job as well. Watched one streamer get force fed with r73 as soon as they took off (https://www.youtube.com/live/p6on2TI3P24?t=6657&si=3H5b1kIcLqd3WlAY). There isnt much you can do when you have no speed to dodge missile. Especially thrust vector irccm one.
Leo2a7 and strv122 can rely on their armor and use those other redeeming qualities at same time.
Engines dont cool off immediately.
It works anyway. Also its more common to dump all munitions on tanks rather than on planes because there isnt much planes on high tiers.
1 Like
i replied to someone who said the leclerc was a bad tank cause it had no armour keep my name out of this
So you’re accepting that only way to kill someone who landed on AF is to use another plane that has onboard A2G munitions while the discussion was based on SAM system vs plane.
Having comprehending issues I see or just casually twisting my words (both of them suits you anyway)
I said the reason why T-Series still performs somewhat decent its because their armor is the only reedeming factor about them which proves the point that armor actually means something in this game but you got such a huge victimizing complex towards T-Series you completely neglected my point.
Every fight depends on relying something on each vehicle, in T-Series case they rely on armor more than any other vehicle.
Only either stupid or biased person would ignore this reality.
I’m accepting that you will presume I’ve said anything or outright twist my words (or anyone else) to suit your narrative, becouse you ignore facts and there is no other way to “prove” your point.
You said that jets are safe on their airfields and added that enemy jets will get attacked by aa:
Then we told you enemy can use various weaponry to kill you without getting shot down by aa. Not just agm or gbu, aam as well.
Dont see any issue with this part btw. Game rewards you with exclusive ability to destroy helis, jets and nukes everywhere (including their nests) for being useful in battle and having jet in lineup.
1 Like
Why does anyone even play as USA like Air I can understand BUT Ground is a bloody joke year after year… Like this is what USA gets
As long as you’re hiding this thing behind something, the only way to kill this is with a pen shot here.
I can’t explain why this thing goes against 11.3 (down to 10.3) Name one tank you could use as USA to counter the BMPT… I would want to say M3A3 Brad. with the Tow-2B, but they have 100mm of pen, and this thing is got ERA everywhere and Tow-2B doesn’t even damage anything more the 60% of the time
Facts? You wrote nothing but empty claims while I disproved them one by one.
First you claimed that your Mı-28Nm keep getting shot down by IRIS-T while in reality 8/9-10 times LDIRCM protects you against those missiles.
Then you claimed that if enemy SAM systems can’t intercept enemy jets then they deserve to loose, the minute I pointed out how wrong that claim is you tried to twist to conversation by saying you can kill enemy plane on AF with another plane by using A2G munitions which had nothing to do with the subject from the beginning.
It seems you like victim pose and accuse people when your empty claims disproved.
1 Like
While it doesnt have magic ammo, it has scouting, uav, agility, 5s reload and m900 which is enough to knock soviets in most cases. Unless ofc rng messes around. Like trunions or fuel tanks. Also it has modern thermals as neat bonus. For both gunner and commander.
And how can I refuse to this babe which gets 5x fnf bombs which unlike mavericks instagib any soviet garbage:
1 Like
Lol, never worte even 1% of that…
Which will if you try to use conventional weapon systems, feel free to disprove.
Discussion was about SAM system vs Jets rather than intercepting enemy jets on af by using A2G munitions.
Never said I have any issues with it, the thing is he claimed that if SAM system fails to intercepts enemy jets then they deserved to cook while I pointed out that smart CAS player can always evade Sam system and rearm as much as he wants while AA players had limited ammunition, then he came back and start claiming you can intercept enemy jets by using another jet with A2G munitions which had nothing to do with conversation from the beginning.
Air to air missiles are pretty conventional for modern jets. And as you could see su39 in video just got away undamaged.
…
the conversation in question
Holy gaslighting…
A2A missiles requires either ir or radar lock.
If the enemy already landed and rearming its engines already cooled down to point where you ir missile cant pickup its signature until you get close, as for the radar guided missiles they will fall into multipath unless you get very luck shot.
Ah yes when it comes to Russian armor its proved by outdated sources while NATO one’s are quite up to date right?
Lmao UK and Germany literally obtained T-80U’s and test fired upon them which the whole reason why both country developed L27A1 and DM53.
So Russian tanks can be modeled based on documents but NATO ones can’t? Damn what a nice hypocrisy.
Not even close.
Getting overpressured by 35mm cannons is universal problem while not having volumetric driver port and getting screw by it is quite different.
1 Like
Its 2 br steps higher, ofc it gets better armament. But it comes with a price that there is a chance to face some scary stuff. Slamraam, chinese counter strike / south america 5, crotale, elde98.
Also its paid so to play it I would have to put money into disk drive or grind su25t from zero.
And another reason why I would play this over su39 is because I already own dollar store su39:
It is my first high tier cas jet. I played 500 battles on it so I can say Im fed up with frogfoots.
Also its always fun to bomb those guys who bought bmpts or grinded arenas thinking they are invincible. Su25bm almost never gets such opportunity.
If its case (I dont really think engines can get cold enough in 10-30s) and you dont want to risk, you can wait till they start taking off and strike them. Yes they can sit there indefinitely but in this case you will still fulfil your duty because they cannot harm your team anymore.
1 Like
If you can intercept an enemy in 10-30 seconds he shouldn’t land from the beginning assuming he’s somewhat decent and noticed bein trailed.
No objection about that since that’s best way to deal with enemy airplane if they already landed.
1 Like