yeah cause armour means everything
1 Like
It does if the game doesn’t represent the armor correctly.
No it doesn’t, it’s just a pure skill issue to rely on your armor.
not if u had it several years before the update like I did…it was free.
-
sams have limited ammo and are vunelerable to 3 different ways of death either helis/planes/tank while you shoot them from your airfield land re arm and go that again now rinse and repeat…
-
Now you can’t deny obivous bias in having a well made flight path of LMURS while jagms and hellfires still fly like …bad word…
-
Pantsir-S1 currently best SACLOS SPAA in the game (12 ready-to-fire missiles, multi targeting system). Let’s not even talk about the next 12.7 Pantsir, this will end top tier experience pure and simple
4.To shoot at russian MBTs, gotta go pixelhunting. Urban debris on the ground ? Good luck shooting at LFP. The MBT does zigzags ? Good luck shooting at LFP. The MBT has bushes all over UFP ? Good luck shooting at driver’s port/breach MEANWHILE YOU SHOOT AN ABRAMS WHERE EVER YOU WANT SAME WITH LECLERC ONLY GERMANS STAND A CHANCE…
Merkava/arietes same as abrams even worse…
1 Like
Same as BUK and Pantsir that get vioalted in many ways, but now thats “russian bias” of course when the NATO started getting violated
Devs believe the path of jagms and hellfires is right tho. They dont touch it because of that.
Yes, and it was still getting violated with AGM65s. Now with JAGM and Brimstone it gets violated as much
basically same as leopards, but instead of “gunner commander” you get a oneshot for shooting there. lol.
1 Like
No, you had to grind the module… granted its better then grinding a new vechicle, but grind none the less. Also the same was for the Z-10ME, but people seem to conveniently forget that.
SAM’s have ammo boxes.
Yes, but they’re still effective.
True, but granted still doesnt change the fack that you need to “baby-sit” the missile (in the cone of the tracking radar).
Sorry but if you’re at the BR’s with Abrams/Leclerc and you have problem hitting the weak spotts on the tanks that you face (in urban combat a.k.a point blank range)… well the problem is not with the armor… it’s with you.
In that case let’s remove overperfoming armor on Russian tanks and add Anti-Era capabilities/munitions to existing NATO tanks since you don’t need armor to begin with right, and if you die in your T-Series that means you have skill issue due to misjudging your position and pushing too much.
Which still limited unlike CAS vehicles that can rearm countless times while bein safe at AF.
Thanks to sheer amount, otherwise they would’ve end up bein trash.
The whole reason why Gaijin decided to add 16 of them instead of limiting 8 missiles like they did it on first dev server.
well if it means that they will get -10 vetrtical aim angle, -40 rear movement speed, 600+ pen munition and survivability? Ill trade that useless armor for sure. Just give me my Yatagan already qwq
1 Like
Sorry we’re talking about realistic feature in here not fantasy.
Russian tanks doesnt have access to those features in real life while NATO tanks has.
Unlike Russian tanks most NATO tanks armor profile unperforming as well.
Well then armor is the realistic feature of them, why that makes you that triggered?
1 Like
The fact that they are overperforming in terms of protection level instead of having realistic values is the problem, not the armor itself.
It’s the sole reason why Russian MBT’s still hold their ground despite their weaknesses, so any claim on how armor is useless is simply coping and lying at this point which some certain people do love to brag about it (not referring to you).
It mogs T-62 in comparision, makes it look pathetic really
Not that it needs to go up it’s that T-62 has no business being 8.7. Same with 435 being 9.0 which is just Object 140 but with a sidegrade if not downgrade of a gun.
They dont really overperform, as their armor is the coverage for their faulties. If anything, the specifications of armor are as much fable on them as on nato side, just balanced to cover for faulties.
Yes, being able to not be oneshotted in any angle any distance is a strength of them. Still, their tanks significantly underperform because of that - the armor isnt as great as 2a7s ans 122Bs, nor as survivability, but the faulties are much more signifcant. So the armor is basicaly a “deadweight” that punishes careless players only, who are minority at top tiers.
- Troll bots
- Undeveloped brains
- Sweat lords
- Devs
Its neither deadweight nor life saver, it’s a thing you would rather have than not, same with good mobility, although that’s smth you have much more control of than your own armour.
If you play USSR try China or Italy for example. While ZTZ’s seem like direct T serie copy pastes if you actually play them you will appreciate the side armour T series have, as well as your LFP being 100/80mm, angled at proper level rather than later ZTZ’s or Ariete
It’s like enjoying being autocannoned frontally.
Im pretty much at my way to obtain China, as it looks to me as just better USSR as of now. I have just one WZ1001 so i’ll grind the ZTZ99 first, and then will try playing it top tier. And im also close to getting the Ariettes of top tier
It is at BR’s like 9.0 or 8.0 or 8.3, 10.3.
Up until the moment you get autocannoned frontally really