Russian Teams Steamrolling NATO - Top Tier is Broken Again?

thats basically a lie. Only difference they have is the autoloader makes them not need to upgrade reload speed skill, which you WILL grind anyway because BEFORE top tier USSR tanks have BIGGER demand for reload speed buff than NATO side tanks. You as much need to get all the aim-related, driving-related, repair and most important SURVIVABILITY (as somehow fuel tank explosion chances are based on crew survivability?) related skills grinded on T serie as on any other soapbox. And AIM SPEED is maybe much more more needed on USSR machinery than on NATO side. Having MAXED OUT turret rotation speed and vertical aim speed on anything up until 72B3 worse than STOCK aim speed of any 2a4-ish machine is such a bad joke.

Why is a BMPT harder to kill than a T-90M?

It makes no sense. I can sit on a hill with the bulldozer hull down and take 20+ hits. Can grab the replay if you don’t believe me.

On the other hand, IRIS-T has hit me while landed on the airfield (not the helipad). Not once, but twice. So… all is fair I guess?

because it was designed to be harder to kill? Well it has twice more crew, more spacing inbetween, one less weakspot and more armor coverage.

1 Like

Frontline Videos suggest otherwise. FPV’s into the turret seem to result in fatal detontions.

Even if this would be true, its BR should be higher. If its harder to kill than a T90 and has also alot more firepower…then its BR should be also much higher.

Russia obvious advantage usually refers to the top BR >11.0
At low BR , T72A T64A T72B is balance . I never tell low BR Rus bias I think even 279 is more balanced than LMUR KH38 BMPT and new Pantsir SM
In short ,Russia bias it means top BR 's unbalance

Damage, yes… “fatal detonations” no…

1 Like

It doesn’t have a lot more firepower than T-90M.

1 Like

Even if Leo 2s lose the turret basket, Germany/Sweden still can’t compete with Russia. Mi-28NM and Su-30SM2 CAS is just way too strong.


Spot on.

And don’t engage those losers. They don’t have arguments so they only can respond with “Yap” or “TLDR”

1 Like

Holy wheelchairs main, I think he is the one who should take a shower

1 Like

Kh38MT vs AGM-65

47 cruise missiles vs 1 janitor?

You know thats his states and not mine…

Said there was no kh38mt.

Do you even think for a sec.

More like 16x amg179 vs 1 buk.
47 cruise missile against 1 janitor

What ever who, but the person owning this stat definitely should

1 Like

I was not talking about ur game. I was talking about missile’s speed, so yeah not relevent with anything you said

Been playing some 11.0 against Russia : very nice, won couple of times.

Decided to move at 5.7 : also very nice, won couple of times.

The moment I played 10.7 US vs Russia : 7 losses in a row (top player in the team in each game btw). It seems there is no paranoia, 10.7 is completely broken by the bias.

Maybe they’ll model T-series basket in 15 years, we don’t know. Let’s hope.

1 Like

Don’t talk about you haven’t played wepon , That sounds absurd




I rellay can imagine not any Russia bias

Dont need to play it.

Its broken just like the lmur

no it really isnt

it still takes ~3 to reliably kill most MBTs

and unlike LMUR it has non zero IOG drift which combined with the very narrow seeker FoV means if it loses lock for a fraction of a second (which it often does because it dips a lot right after launch) then it will never hit the target

and combined with the lack of a proper lofting flight profile it is more likely to lose lock because of a bush or something