Spoiler
What ?
1 Like
Based on? The core is the same length as BM-60s but the round is going to be slightly slower, the L-O shows that perforation would be 590mm, nothing more…
1 Like
MTE ≠ MT According to other russian players
Love how it says nothing about MTE when you switch the language to rusian, almost like it’s a propaganda piece xdd Oh wait…
Oh only look at that, the only listed seekers are INS+Laser and INS+GPS+Laser
4 Likes
Well supposedly the MTE isn’t even the same thing as MT, according to finding in the thread about KH-38.
Eg it doesn’t have the IR seeker
That would mean that the picture from the air show doesn’t exist because that is an ME
Like idk, there’s no point in bringing it up. They have their ONLY 1 and only SUPPOSED photo of 38mt under a plane, which is with 100% certainty either a weighted mockup or a ballistic mockup. But that was enough for gaijin to think that it’s real…
How I know? - There’s literally 0 photos or witness mentions of 38mt apart from that. Any photo we’ve seen so far was a mockup of some sort. We even figured a factory producing them.
3 Likes
I guarantee that Gaijin did not know about that picture and just went off of a brochure
Well we have pictures from Zhuhai airshow
Spoiler
1 Like
Oh they sure didn’t. How I know that? Zuhai airshow 2024 where this booklet was snatched from was happening in November. “Alpha Strike” rolled out in March 2024.
1 Like
See? That’s exactly what I was talking about. He’s showing you a somehow enhanced photo of a photo in a booklet where you can’t even really tell which version it is, let alone if it’s a mockup or not. Which it is.
2 Likes
Notice how many sub-variants it has for training/display, and the lack of specification as to which of those variants is displayed?
Well why decided that they have to look differently ?
Who said those two wouldn’t be deleted by 2030 for example ?
its not a scam, it just went nowhere. It happens all the time.
Zero evidence of it ever passing the mockup stage.
Zero evidence of it ever actually existing.
Zero credible evidence of it ever being mounted to an aircraft.
Also, by its own marketing brochure, it’s vasly overperforming. The brochure shows it would be suitable for hitting buildings and ships at best, most certainly not tracking a moving tank from 10+km away.
We’ve been over this again and again and again, and not once has any evidence been produced, outsise of photos of the mockup, a brochure from an air show which contains a photo which has what look like the mockups
So yeah, it fails every test for the ‘standards’ gaijin claim to hold for weapons.
tldr - it’s fake, gaijin made it up and got caught.
7 Likes
Yeah, any mention was removed from the russian site. I believe the english version still has it, probably because they know they’re never selling weapons to the english speaking world for a very long time so just didn’t bother to update it.
SS doesn’t agree.
SACLOS vehicles aren’t in the same league as ARH/IR ones.
Statcard is one thing, real game performance is another.
1 Like
So Kh-38ML can exist but MT version is just went nowhere because why ?
1 Like
Real game performance is immense, the missile ignores multipathing VIA large proxy, it’s just as susceptible to notching as other ARH SAMs, it’s also the fastest SAM in game (behind starstreak).
Samp/T and sky sabre are far worse at killing the actual aircraft, and specialise in munition interception
So we do still get them if needed.
It is.
So just how adding 16AJ to Japan in order for them to compete is Japanese bias.
Thank you very much.
1 Like