Oh, here comes his typical cope comments? Because he can’t prove hes right, he just knows hes right. He only has to prove it to himself right? Right.
“They got taken out in the end” it’s weird that western media blocks the Russian side of things.
Would love to see it on both sides.
Or would that be coping for you?
In any case, the situation will repeat the situation with the Su-25T/TM, which can also receive a thermal imager, but will never receive it.
I already proved that duels have been won by Leopard 2s in Ukraine against russian MBTs tho? So yes, you’re coping, it’s not “typical”, you factually are denying proof just so you can continue living in some sort of self-induced fantasy where the fight was never won lmao.
The rest of your comment is irrelevant tbh, seems like you got carried about by your emotions there tho :P
Oh there he goes again with his made up facts!
You do know, that’s thousands of vehicles were supplied to Ukraine right?
If abrams or Leo’s were any good, they wouldn’t be copying the hw of the Russians by slapping ERA, and FPV deterrent all over their tanks.
Nice rage bait, lol. You haven’t proven a single thing XD
You know you can just look up bug-reports on NATO MBTs, right?
And if you had used the old forum (on the off chance you did, you likely spent all of your time there obviously defending Russia soo), you’d know that even the tech mods (cough @Conraire cough) have made it known that Russian MBTs sport overperforming armor.
:D
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
Which is dumb. Every other nations has tons
Of thermal equipped cas in game.
I’m merely asking for my KA-50 to be usable in night time conditions
The developers have already responded regarding thermal imagers:
Since most of them are prototypes, we will not be adding them, but we will add a prototype to the Su-30.
You really want to compare Iraqi T72A tanks, which didn’t even have night vision and had an obsolete APFSDS, with other more modern vehicles? You’re showing a lot of knowledge, wow!
Hey man, CNN told me so it’s true
They would because the tanks are old…Russia are using current and brand new tanks and despite Relikt being a “miracle armour” they are still being penetrated and still exploding.
Do you want know how NATO or even Britain would deal with FPV drones…
Laser weapons as have been tested and are the cheap, easy to integrate , ammo is cheap with pennies a shot and finally it is laser accurate. Or even things like Rheinmetall Skyranger systems. There is no excuse for Russia right now to be having this level of problems with FPV drones.
There’s nato aircraft with experimental thermals.
So, one way street mentality?
You clearly don’t understand power demands for things like this.
Have you ever done anything with electricity?
Or been in the military?
Ever heard of supply lines?
Or constantly expanding / collapsing front lines?
I want to compare how they exploded and killed the crew when penetrated every single time.
That design flaw has lived with the 72/80 and 90 series since the 70s.
A tank that will incinerate the crew most of the time is not a good tank. That aside, current Russian main tank the T-90M Obr 24
Is still a T-72 at heart, you cannot out design a bad a design.
I understand that the shell didn’t kill any crew members. But what you have to understand, is that the shot that he made one year ago would 100% disable an Abrams today. That shot will 100% take out the turret ring. He wouldn’t have died.
Yes the Abrams would have still survived to die on the next reload.
His shot still immobilized him, meanwhile i survived with my autoloader turning orange. But it’s convenient for you to ignore that.
They plan to fit it to tanks and IFVS you don’t need a lot of power because you aren’t shooting it miles away.
I am Hydro engineer
Supply lines impact FPV drones?
Again collapsing lines just shows poor Russian scouting/light infantry doctrine they should be sweeping and securing the flanks of a pocket and not allowing UA to push back in ambush forces.
Considering that many drones now fly at an altitude of 1 meter, expensive lasers and air defense systems are useless.
Drones are easier to produce, smaller, cheaper. I somehow doubt you’re a hydro engineer… but for now I’ll believe you.
Judging by how big that system looks, it is a massive burden that likely big down advances.
But that image you sent isnt all that great.
There were barely 200 MBTs supplied by the NATO to Ukraine. They didn’t even have the best upgrades since the US had to remove the DU from the armor and couldn’t send the M829 series of rounds due to DU export restrictions. The Pentagon also didn’t want to send the Abrams to Ukraine because they knew it wouldn’t perform well without all the supporting infrastructure
