Judging spookston video about IS-7 if you take more than 12 rounds your entire front hull section becomes ticking bomb with shell charges.
Otherwise it has really good survivability against convential munitions and even against early APFSDS rounds by the looks of it.
Well when its hull was exposed, i never spent more than two shots to destroy it. So probably the IS-7 is AS good as 279, but as prone to punish mostly less experienced players as it.
Don’t rely on luck and it’s $2000. If you have the object 279 it can easily eliminate the urge since its a better heavy tank.
I wont spend 2000$ on IS-7. 60, maybe 70 i would agree. 2000$ can buy you a car.
I have it, but IS-7 is just different
I couldn’t decide which one actually looks cooler lol the object 279 definitely more iconic. I bet people who has the IS-7 wants the Object 279, but you and I want the IS-7.
I`d say better. We all want to have both :3
But i wasnt avaliable for the IS-7 event, and now its just impossible to get the icon
Even if aim weak point, Russia tank also can eat your shell and nothing happened
I don’t understand. Russia has dominated all the competitions in the past five years. The average KD of the BMPT has reached 2.4. Why do some people still say that NATO tanks are better than them?
Don’t you guys want a more powerful T14, Obj 195? The breakdown turret of the M1 Leopard 2. How on earth can Russian players satisfy themselves with this?
IS-7 really needs those downtiers to remain a good vehicle.
Anything that isn’t conventional AP or really low caliber darts/HEAT will just go through your turret easily and get your gunner + rounds at the back of your turret.
Now it has dropped down a lot with BR changes and nerfs.
Because they are ?
Which can also happen on NATO tank. I have shot NATO ammo rack before and nothing happened. I have been shot by other tank in a Western MBT before and literally nothing happen. Sure it goes both way I have shot a russian tank and it get off scot free.
Instead of blaming Gaijin for not being able to make the game consistent gotta blame the russian tank cause muh confirmation biased ? Why always like that /
Russian
i would not say russia is weak in top br, i migth have skill issiue cuz im new to top br but i never seem able to rly pen the russian tanks while i can pen leopards etc
Its still best performing ifv among others by the looks of it.
Make it 12.0 so it cannot haress 10.7’s.
Lol, no.
The Cassette’s Driven Motor housing is somehow completely omitted ( it should be very important as an effort to avoid the potential for “Driver, Engine” shots to the lower LFP magically bypassing the autoloader with no damage done.) from the autoloader module entirely, since it takes up the space under the Turret since the structural guide for the Cassette doesn’t sit on the floor of the Hull. The M1’s for example also get a Hydraulic accumulator in the fighting compartment instead of the actual pump in the engine compartment where it should be.
So NATO tank get basket , Russia tank maybe soon get T14 T15
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
Source ?
In this major Russia only one get a new top spaa : pantsir sm .It can well believe In future major Russia would also only one get something
