MT version doesn’t exist aside from some mockups.
Please provide a source for this by showing us KH38 with IR seeker and also IR seekers specifications on 38 fuselage.
Which means it hasn’t tested nor deployed nor it has actual data on how it bevahes.
Even MIG 1.44 has more reliable data than KH38MT at this point.
Among all the missiles I have used – AIM-120C-5 are the worst, because it easily loses the target.
“Ryaaa, you are russophobe!!!” Is this really the level of your argumentation?
so it means its a lie?
They try to sell this there if you remember.
fair gameplay means that not the tech stats decide if you win, much like it was with Phoenix rockets or AGM-65s until countries got the FNF SPAAs
Also same going with BMPTs now. German mains cant help but cry about why USSR tank doesnt get blown up by the wind.
It’s not a lie. Pylons themselves are universal – any weapon may be attached but can’t be launched if pylon have different other LAU (APU/AKU) wiring.
On expo they just attached all possible to use by Mi-28NM weapon. It’s just a demonstration.
These “German mains” in the same room as us?
Again, as much as i remember being there at the time, they try to sell those techs to the South Africa, Iran, ect. So they said it can launch that on the text description and with the guide. Thats what i ask, if that means they lied?
Wiring sounds like no issue to a man with some spare parts. Especially when NM should have been a new mod that can launch those LMURs
Its not that simple.
For example PIDS pylons on F-16 can theoretically be wired to carry A2A missiles but none has been seen with that configuration so far.
well thats also a fair point
Have I’ve sayed anything about LMUR? I quoted a statement about ATGM’s on the inner pylons…
“Theoretically, a single Mi-28NM could carry eight LMUR missiles on four APU-L twin launchers, but it’s hard to imagine that the weapon system operator would actually have time to guide such a large number of missiles in a single sortie.”
Source
Hammer cant track moving targets, but…
Rafale gets two extra missiles, but…
That’s not hundred percent proven and there is a debate for that.
Rafale F3 has been tested with extra missiles unlike Su-27SM/30SM.
Don’t know why I’m getting quoted here since I didn’t make any such comment. However I can also play this game:
You were coping out of your mind with the talk about facts being subject to interpretation. You got called out on that being bs, but instead of just accepting it you just pull the “that’s discrimination/russophobia”. Really really weak…
Aaand? They are just demonstrate that Mi-28NM is possible to use LMUR.
It can launch LMUR. On different pylon.
Show me a photo/video there’s Mi-28NM uses LMUR on inner side in battle configuration.
Not a reliable source.
But F3 tested it while R-77 twin pylon can’t be attached by Su-27/30 because of it’s width.
Well a guess when you have personal agenda… nothing is a reliable source.
Booklets/brochures/technical manuals are reliable sources.
So where are the “booklets/brochures/technical manuals” for the:
AASM 250 Hammer seeker locking and tracking moving target at 10 km.
The Rafale in French service with up to 8 MICA-EM’s.
and while we’re at it… where are the “booklets/brochures/technical manuals” that says MICA-EM is the only missile with 7° seeker field of view, while every other missile having 15°…
I guess thoes doesnt count as double standarts/bias… but yeah it’s not Russian, so its OK then. I gett it.
Everyone you quoted is very much literate, you’re just straight up retarded if you think that „russia player“ is a group that someone can be prejudiced against in the same way as ethnic groups.
I literally explained to you what the difference is
Welcome to WT
Bro let it go, it will get even more dumb every time you answer their question .
If you didn’t know being rational is important in matters of judgement.
It literally wasn’t adressed to you.
Where did i pulled that can i have a quote ?
So it’s just double standart then ?
From your side?