No. Usually opinions should be grounded in facts but they are not the same.
Example:
„LMUR is op.“ is an opinion.
„LMUR is the only correctly lofting AGM rn despite multiple sources“ is a fact.
Saying:“ I think the LMUR is op, because it’s the only correctly lofting agm“ would be an opinion based on a fact.
Again where do you see russophobia?
There is no difference between this and AIM-120-C5 range.
Yes there is. Opinions are open to interpretation. Facts aren’t. They are 2 different things. Your C5 example is an opinion. Just as my last LMUR sentence
Yeah that’s not Russophobia lol
I literally show how presenting facts matters and you saying that is an opinion. If someone ask you do like orange will you answer them “It’s a fruit” ?
Back to this question then.
Yes because you seemingly still don’t understand what the difference is. Reread my example above it’s quite good.
So you’re really standing by the choice that comparing black people having a medical condition is a suitable comparison to checks notes people that play russia in a video game ?
What you are describing is an opinion or conclusion based on a fact (in isolation).
The fact still remains a fact, there is no interpreting it, it either has the best range or it doesn’t.
Familiar faces).
Nonsense. It`s so far-fetched rubbish…
AAHHAHAHAHHAHAHA
Nope. It`s one of the most pathetic missile of top tier.
T-72A definitely has some qualities over Kpz-70 that people might find useful though.
Literally show it as manipulation over a fact what you trying to disproove here ?
You really illitirate arent you ? Giving deragatory prejudgement to group of people based on their uniting charesteristics is basic for Racism/Sexism e.t.c. which is literally your statement.
MT version doesn’t exist aside from some mockups.
Please provide a source for this by showing us KH38 with IR seeker and also IR seekers specifications on 38 fuselage.
Which means it hasn’t tested nor deployed nor it has actual data on how it bevahes.
Even MIG 1.44 has more reliable data than KH38MT at this point.
Among all the missiles I have used – AIM-120C-5 are the worst, because it easily loses the target.
“Ryaaa, you are russophobe!!!” Is this really the level of your argumentation?
so it means its a lie?
They try to sell this there if you remember.
fair gameplay means that not the tech stats decide if you win, much like it was with Phoenix rockets or AGM-65s until countries got the FNF SPAAs
Also same going with BMPTs now. German mains cant help but cry about why USSR tank doesnt get blown up by the wind.
It’s not a lie. Pylons themselves are universal – any weapon may be attached but can’t be launched if pylon have different other LAU (APU/AKU) wiring.
On expo they just attached all possible to use by Mi-28NM weapon. It’s just a demonstration.
These “German mains” in the same room as us?
Again, as much as i remember being there at the time, they try to sell those techs to the South Africa, Iran, ect. So they said it can launch that on the text description and with the guide. Thats what i ask, if that means they lied?
Wiring sounds like no issue to a man with some spare parts. Especially when NM should have been a new mod that can launch those LMURs
Its not that simple.
For example PIDS pylons on F-16 can theoretically be wired to carry A2A missiles but none has been seen with that configuration so far.
well thats also a fair point
Have I’ve sayed anything about LMUR? I quoted a statement about ATGM’s on the inner pylons…
“Theoretically, a single Mi-28NM could carry eight LMUR missiles on four APU-L twin launchers, but it’s hard to imagine that the weapon system operator would actually have time to guide such a large number of missiles in a single sortie.”
Source
Hammer cant track moving targets, but…
Rafale gets two extra missiles, but…
That’s not hundred percent proven and there is a debate for that.
Rafale F3 has been tested with extra missiles unlike Su-27SM/30SM.