Calm down mate, you’re way too emotional.
Oh wait sounds familiar that’s called gaslighting and You were just doing that thank You very much, after all it’s fine when You do it to someone bit not when someone does that to you
That’s not how burden of proof works. If nobody mentions that a tank has a spall liner, it probably doesn’t have one. But you’re making the claim that it does indeed have one. So you need to prove that and find someone who says it does who isn’t a third party source.
So
#1 you still haven’t found where you CLAIM i called someone " mentally retarded "
#2 now you admit you’re gaslighting, and trying to say im also gas lighting?
Truly, what a fascinating creature you are.
Specialist posted a source claiming that but i really need more info to back it up anyways
Go back and re-read the the last 30 minutes of this thread or so, because you’re so confused about who had made what claim that even Neptune bows down to you.
It was sartt who had claimed that Abrams has spall liners, not @UnHolySausage
1 Like
So you’ve never heard of political lobbying?
Nah i just did it to gaslight You since You don’t like it when they gaslight You but only when You gaslight others, the double Morale it’s very good here
I was referring to sartt and him, when he posted this message:
7.5 - 8.0 seconds on average and in practical conditions*
Devilish.
i mean once again go read the bug reports
Just doing my job :3
Read it with the comma that’s why i put a comma there
The bug reports don’t use valid sourcing, just third party sources like tank encyclopedia which is not a valid source
1 Like
Already did still You tried to gaslight me into blindly believing You and then lying that the info is classified when it isnt, that’s called gaslighting
Also doesn’t include the fact of heavy US political lobbying used as sources.
Yeah he pointed me on his sources wich is a random 3rd party website yipeee wh would’ve guessed
1 Like