Wiesel has thermals, DM63, and a very fast and tiny chassis. It’s more of a light tank than an AA.
6 Likes
I see no Russian bias, only a Soviet SPAA that was mostly used against Infantry in Afghanistan.
2 Likes
“Ooga booga I have a picture and some numbers”
The Su-27SM is 13.7 and the F-15J(M) is 13.7. Is that Japanese bias?
Data and reasoning means at least saying X has this and Y has that, or bringing up KPB
5 Likes
Clear German bias as Wiesel 1a4 shouldn’t be classified as an SPAA
1 Like
yeah dont you see how the soviet zsu with the sams are at 9.3 meanwhile everyone else is stuck with garbage spaa, although i dont think its radar or range is very good
I may be wrong cause i haven’t used the those 2 SPAA. But i believe the only thing you listed that has a lead indicator is the 163.
So if I’m correct no bias.
Are you able to elaborate on your position in more detail?
Also, does the 4M2 even have radar?
Shilka M2 (Has no radar, decent ammo capacity, and is an extremely large and easy target)
Wiesel 1A4 (Has no radar, meh ammo capacity, small and fast target)
M163 (it’s a damn Vulcan with a radar on a M113, why wouldn’t you expect it to be at least 7.7
No, it doesn’t -_-
If you were to take the radar off the 163 it could go to 7.3. A vulcan isn’t much of a game changer compared to the shilka.
Please be more specific, I don’t understand your skill issue here.
2 Likes
I presume it’s some gripe about the near 4.0 br gap in the US TT
Good thing that the next update will give the US 2 spaas
Oh? Where you hear this?
From the most recent mod team info post
We dont know anything about the one spaa but the skink will be nice to have. The cannons are not good at range but it will be much harder for cas to take it out.
I knew about the skink discussion. New domestic SPAA to fill in will be nice. The if all goes to plan is concerning.
Yeah. I would love for a break from new top tier mbts/jets and just have an update that tries to fill holes.
Sadly, i dont see them doing much to help spaa. US chaparral has had a big bug for over 8 months which has no fix in sight.
I used to play it a lot but i havent touched it since the bug effectively removed the upgraded missile
Yet again, the third topic about Russian bias I see this week. Is this a new record?
Let’s go to the facts. I never played the Afghan since I don’t see any interest to grind a vehicle in this specific BR just to get forced to play 8.3 - 8.7 due to the high population in this BR.
ZSU-23-4M2 doesn’t have any radar but the double of the ammo on the ZSU-23-4 and the ZSU-23-4M4, it’s the same slow chassis and the same armor protection (none), bad ammunition penetration power around 51mm at point blank, and it’s a huge vehicle and it will be easily rendered a long distances due to the 250% visibility percentage.
Wiesel 1A4 is more agile, has access to APDS rounds, good at scouting with turns to be even better with the 2nd-3rd generation thermal imager making it a perfect scout unit, it’s also small with only 62% visibility percentage, you won’t see this vehicle unless you directly point at him.
This visibility system we have in game is a pretty tricky to understand, in fact, I may be wrong regarding to this specific point.
As mentioned by SidewaysCube946 it doesn’t show any proof of bias toward Russia, I wonder if you ever played it to be stating this as much people do when die to it.
The M163 is the same as the Shilka, high firerate but no penetration for mostly medium and heavy vehicle, you mostly rely on assisting allies, they’re on the same situation, actually M163 can hold some shots from HMG at front and depending the angle and distance, on the side too, maybe the rear too as it has the same milimeter in all arc.
As much others here and in any other topics: no it’s not Russian bias. And me: there’s no Russian bias; you’re only another brainwashed guy by rage and content creators that has the same ideas.
4 Likes
Look at the stats and tell me its bias again you imbecile