I’m not aware of any vehicle-based ATGM that is issued in the US or any other western country capable of firing on the move that is represented in-game, but if you find the footage and post I’d be glad to know more.
1 Like
It’s not better than the HSTVL at all man, that’s just a straight up false hood, if you put the HSTVL at the same BR as the 2S38 it’ll definitely blow it out the water.
I just don’t see them at all, what I do see are BMPTs wiping teams with extreme prejudice.
As I’ve said I’m playing France, Italy, and China at 11.7 and up and don’t see Lmurs etc much.
the new pantsir as well don’t see it much. I did mention it shooting down my munitions a couple times if you’d bothered to read
Shall we go through the past 5 years of additions between germany russia and america and see how many are busted or have been busted throughout the years?
it’s literally what they do, tree by tree they have a flavour of the month.
lol no not just alvis.
I’ve seen literally pages of different people arguing agianst the point of russian MBTs being busted.
You’ve just chosen to ignore it completely.
@_Renzo is one of the few you can see in here actively proving your point wrong . He doesn’t bait people, he converses with them. as well as @pooqich again, doesn’t bait or try provoke anything just counter argues points which are created by stupidity.
Sorry what? none of my arguments work ? why not? because they don’t suit the narrative that you are pushing
I’ve over four thousand hours and 6 years playing the game mate, I’ve seen BS biases for each nation come and go.
I can’t deny flightpaths? what about flightpaths?
debuff russia seen it all now.
They added DM53, M829A2, 5 second reloads to almost every NATO MBT, they added SPAA such as the IRIS T which blew stuff like pantsir out the water.
THe first heavy cruiser premium in game was german and broke naval for time as well.
video proof has never been used by gaijin which has always been a well known fact.
The fact you don’t understand how it may be edited and changed tells us everything we need to know.
They’ve actively rejected video sources for every vehicle in game, irregardless of it being Russian or not.
get your head out the sand.
they actually over buffed the leclercs cause of peoples sources.
@Ralin has proper sources which prove the reload rate of leclercs for example is too fast.
However gaijin used souces provided and now it has an A historcal reload rate.
as a caveat Ralin yeah I looked into it I was completely wrong about the leclercs reloads as well as their spall liners.
A yes the same Germany that got the puma at 8.3.
the same germany which has South african lights which should rightfully be in the british tree.
teh same germany which is loaded with super strong light tanks from the BR of 6.7 and up?
It’s not a bias for them not to be added to the game yet.
Spikes are decent as has been proved, not great, not bad.
Decent.
They get lofting and then almost every ground vehicle in game is buggered, same as they should remove lofting from the LMURs completely.
Hellfires flight paths also follow not too far off what they should IRL BTW, they loft up then come down when supposed to.
It’s been a merry goround for a while at top tier. Germany had all the eggs not long ago, IRIS T, Phoon, 2A7 ?
or we brushing over that.
USA had the F15E , 6 abrams between the prems and TT ones all firing the highest penning L/44 round in game.
HSTVL etc or shall we glaze over that.
the big three always have had preferntial treatment for ages.
Oh japan as well with teh Type 90s sitting under BR’d for ages completely destroyed 10.3 - 11.3 for months
Starting with the SU30SM which as far as I can tells only real “bias” is the fact it has the two engine mounted missiles.
the double rack AMRAAM carriers FOR WHAT PLANE cause you got them on the F18s.
So on the topic of ARB, which has pretty much been dominated for years by the USA, then the gripen followed by USA, then the Rafale followed by the typhoons.
Which BTW absolutely dust the Su30SM easily.
ARB russian planes were always cheeks lol. MIG23M with a whopping 12 CMs up against stuff like the F4E with 90, more missiles, better FM, better gun. ETC
What missing weapon was added to china?
Also my opinion on the KH38MT is well known, it should be removed until proven it exists. Not left in game until proven it doesn’t
It’s also not just in russia though so.
what like giving germanies Typhoon brimstones it historically never had?
or completely nuetering one of the typhoons most tactically advatnageous weapons it has?
GNSS modelling doesn’t work for anyone though? it’s not like it works for russia either.
Wait until you realise that most weapons in game don’t function like they’re supposed to
And there it is so many of “our” cas weapons.
You’ve got literally F18s, F15Es, F16s and even F14s if you’re brave enough to choose from and all of which can carry stand-off munitions.
Why are Brimstones the only Missile at top tier which doesn’t have some kind of fire and forget feature like say, the 6 mavericks an F16 can carry.
Because they’ll likely add things like the F15EX to add it to.
Also is it proven that those aircraft can carry it?
No one has ever disputed that THEY HAVE WORSE MBTS is the point lol.
the dudes also in no position to be commenting on others performance.
2 Likes
It is, because it is the only post detailing exactly what is happening, in details, at top tier against Russia rn.
Me, that still hasn’t used more than half of the ammo in HSTVL in a match.
In-fact, I’ve dropped my ammo count on MBTs down to 12 - 19 rounds recently.
I’m all in on sustained performance rather than longevity.
I’m not trying to get 10:1 KDRs.
You quite literally ignore any point which proves you otherwise and claim it as falshoods.
even seen folks agreeing with you claiming things like statshark are “rigged” then using thunderskill.
BMPT has been nerfed a few times already? firstly BR step incrases.
Secondly trying to make it’s modules take actual damage.
It’s a premium BIAS, they also added the puma at fking 8.3 ?wasthat german bias?
It was almost as broken as the BMPT damage model wise.
im sorry what?? rigged numbers xD
You’ve absolutely ZERO evidence to support that at all.
the highest win rate nations in teh damn game have conviently been france and Italy, which are considered widely some of the worst MBTs at top tier.
hell, china had the M1A2 as the best MBT at top tier KD and win rate wise for a while.
A broken ass tank being added doesn’t make it russian bias.
They added as I said and you chose to ignore to other trees broken vehicles before which completely broke the game.
hell the M1 caused the entire match maker to be overhauled when it was added.
Yeah but acting like you’re some godly player due to getting nukes, but can’t win a game with the M1 KVT is stupid as hell.
TOW quite literally stands for Tube-launched, Optically tracked, Wire-guided
The current NATO tech is not tow anymore. But they chose not to implement them ingame, because it would give NATO an advantage (in fact, it would balance their launchers with the russian ones).
i forgot this piece of shit even existed
Conveniently.
funny how you leave out the most produced modern nato mbt out
Man, again, NATO =/= Germany and Sweeden only. There are 6 different NATO MBTs out there, maybe it’s time for Gaijin to consider them.
they actually did increase the hitbox size of traverse modules and added an autoloader module
Oh wow, such a nerf! With an autoloader that doesn’t even explode!
because armor will mean nothing if they implemented those megadarts
It is what it is. You wanna put in place a realistic war sim game, without bias ? You don’t do selective realism, you implement everything. Even if it means Russia must suffer (the horror).
cool now russian mbts have literally nothing going for them
surely you would then agree that they stand at a significantly lower br than the superior nato mbts
RIGHT?
Why would I, as Leclercs/Arietes/Challengers are already GARBAGE, but still sit at 12.7, same BR as russian MBTs ?
Does it seem to bother them, seeing Leclercs at 12.7 while it should go 12.0 as it is so damn bad ? I don’t think so.
Lower BRs for Russia, not for NATO, lmao. It’s called russian bias.
and all of those have different things that make them stand out against others
Ragebait, Arietes/Leclercs are literally poo.
there are two A7’s ingame
It’s still german at the origin.
Maybe compare IS2 to the heavies of its same BR ? lmaooo, such dishonesty
Conveniently enough.
Yes yeees, the famous “volumetric/bad shot” excuse lmaoooo
Rewatch the clips, actually I invite everyone who is neutral in this conversation to watch the clips themselves, and make an opinion for themselves.
Everybody know it’s straight russian bias.
What kind of logic is this ?
A few nations will get darts which will pen everything everywhere ?You don’t care about balance, as long as Nato is OP i guess.
It’s called selective realism ?? You don’t want certain NATO shells to be implemented, because it would ruin the russian supremacy ?
What kind of realism is this exactly ? “Sim war game, but always in favor of Russia” ??
What people don’t realize is that would either lead to Russian tanks being downtiered (have fun with a 11.7/12.0 BVM), or them being buffed so that the new darts don’t really change much when facing them.
Well idk, maybe don’t artificially buff/downtier russian stuff on purpose and without proper reasons ?
NATO stuff is better IRL, so we have to give russian MBTs magical powers ? Russian bias doesn’t exist, does it ?
i want to se other vehiclen no only one wich is most better stats…
The IS-2s are bad and overtiered. The 1944 has a massive LFP weakspot for 6.7 (!!) and the older one is even worse.
The Is-2s are the worst examples you could use since they are actually overtired.
Well I also bait plenty when I’m online. However mostly if I’m super bored and I mostly stick to the WT reddit for that.
japan bias
actually screw this, its actually germany bias
If Russian tanks don’t have any advantages over tanks at the same BR, either those tanks need to move up, or Russian tanks need to move down. It’s only fair.
I don’t disagree, but balance needs to be a part of it, and if everything was accurate, top tier Russia would end at a lower BR than anyone else.
1 Like
It’s not rng.
Shoot better. Shoot the manlet, lfp, neck. Like everyone else
i thought we were talking about 7.7 heavies?
but sure here you go
that lfp shot will do nothing btw
1 Like
It’s not only 20 games, it’s the 20 games coupled with my hundreds lol.
it quite literally is
ricochet chance is, shocker - A CHANCE
1 Like
Not even close to that split. I would even wager that 45-50 of them were against Russia.
But just because it’s you, I’ll sort through the replays of my games today to find the Ratio. I must have played around 30 of those Ariete games today.
However it’ll be an hour or 2 before I can start and finish doing that.
1 Like
Yeah with less ammo ? or maybe lower quality thermals ? give me in what it is better ;)
no becuase like about the hstvl you do not say why hstvl is better… I said why it is worse with worse ammo and thermals xDDDDDD
Go ahead and show me how long it took gaijin to fix them compared to russian stuff ;)
LMUR vs hellfire and JAGM’s … gues what is that about
And russians have also ~600mm pen round and? they have stable reload with the autoloader sometimes reloading when it should nto and to get “5” seconds you need ace crew ;)
or maybe stocp acting dumb and acknolwedge that half of russian stuff which is made only on bruchures is in game while we have real life proof they don’t want to add because the russians would not be op?
KH-38MT not video but bruchure proof xDDDDDDD Only the laser version is correct rest is full on brochure…
hahahaha decent? flight path is bad compared ot LMUR
Damage model targeting something it would never do irl compared to LMUR just stop coping russkie main just stop xD
no… top down attack baby you missed that right?
and?
in russia you have best spaa long range / close range
you have best CAS in game
You have best helicopter with IRCCM where it is not suppose to with 8 CORRECTLY implemented missiles which guarantee stable 6 kills per one reload…
you have best light tanks the cannons are far more accurate then they should compared to nato 30’s
guess what why most of them are on the us and others side instead of russians ? ← yes lmurs / 38mt’s etc etc…
they should at least get ir tracking…
yes withotu anything that can penetrate the iron dome the new pantsir has… add a few free ones and you have a wall…
yes.
you have 19 games in it stop glazing russians alvis on all of the posts…
yeah still too low and don’t see any more changes lol
and it was bumped up higher very fast as well…
here you go thisis hwo spikes should hit…
1 Like
It’s my point.
It’s not represented ingame, because they chose not to.
No one has ever disputed that THEY HAVE WORSE MBTS is the point lol.
So Russia does have better IFVs ? So there is a russian bias, right ?
Ngl, you write too much after this post, I’m kinda tired responding to every single person here. Your posts are too long, I can’t answer that
I quickly read your next post, and it is just coping. And also, I got couple of nukes with the kvt, even if I loose majority of 10.7 games because of the russian bias. That’s my - very fast - answer to all of that cope