At 12.7 the bmpt is annoying at 11.7 and under the bmpt is still broken. The problem isn’t russia the problem I see is they have the bmpt and the sm-sv which has made top tier not enjoyable. However, even with those broken tanks russia does make much of a difference at 12.7 but its ungoldy at 11.7 or under.
I would say just go look at winrates per nation. Currently russia at 11 is obviously broken but that’s it. At 12.7 the new uneeded spaa us a dread for CAS players
yea u r right about the BMPT and the SPAA but there is that RNG code towards russia on top. i cant prove it but i know theyre rigging the game with codes and algorythms. I explained it already with my expirience: When i unlocked the Namer and Namer Thriskon 3 out of 4 SPIKE LR did kill stuff all over the place for about 20 matches then the Spike as crap as everyone says. Iwas wondering why people complain and after about 20 mathces till today they re truly crap. same with my Leo 2A7HU from Italy: I literally one shotted anything, i didnt even aim anywhere specific.
Same i had years ago with the HSTVL. Or after a long break, aprox first 20 matches are towards me or balanced and then some code kicks in.
Its like algorythms in the backgrounds pulls you down at a certain point and the same code is permanently enabled towards russian tanks. IMO theyre not just made OP (Pantsirs, BMPTs) theyre very often Controlled-RNG pretected…
anyways, i am done with this game
Brother you need to take a break from the game. I would recommend you play USA Naval when you’re stressed like me and then get back to GRB. Maybe there’s some truth to it maybe they favor people who spend a lot of money (I have spent a lot since this is my only favorite game) but I say 100% BMPT is broken and needs to be removed and SM-SV needs a major nerf.
Have you played russia 12.7?
absolutely yes. Time to review bomb steam
I ve grinded russia 5 or 6 yrs ago up to the top tier before the T90 was out and i stopped playing it ever since because i dont like most of thier tanks from the esthetics and it doesnt fit my playstyle. i unlocked the pantsir but never bought it till today because back then the BIAS was already there and i d rather play skilled NATO and loose more than winning by default. Until now, constantly loosing isnt fun especially if you know you dint loose because theyre better players insteat because the get the coded advantage. I ve been in a russian clan so i know they love armor and firepower and hate “sneaky players” ambushing them with IFVs and thats what i love to do lol.
Are you acting like the 100-200 games you and SadRIPer provided is a good sample size?
My guy, there are hundred of thousands or likely even millions of games played each month, your 100-200 games is less than 0.1% of all games played. So a meaningless sample size.
?
You know election polling is done on a fraction of a percent of all voters and yet is quite accurate.
At a minimum all that is needed is about 30 or so to have a relevant sample, though of course the more the better.
You do have a good point overall. I guess in this case my problem is more with the fact that these 100-200 games come from only 2-4 players, which can screw with the data due to a number of variables.
Eh.
The data should be fine, if anything it limits (in a statistical sense) how powerful the observations is, and the type of claims that should be made (that are supported by the gathered dataset).
But based on what has been said by Gaijin is that they balance (by skewing the matchmaker itself, map sidedness and constituent team basis)on population, not nation by Nation to achieve a net 50% win rate globally as best as possible.
As such a skewed map and to some degree powerful nations / vehicles are required to make things work more smoothly permitting the matchmaker to be less obvious than it is.
Which is why a symptom of overpowered vehicles is the deployment of mixed matchmaking of a Matches to permit the possibility of accounting for this by matching a nation against itself (and thus permitting the shuffling of the target squad / player onto a team with those worse off and a map & side that is least likely to win).
You have to realize that even slight edges account massively for felt disturbances in balance over time. and that the 50% rate is the basis for the meta-economy and progression is balanced around. and why basically all activities have diminishing returns in terms of RP & SL
Except that is exactly what SadRIPer does? And why I go against his claims.
According to him, him having a low winrate over 100-200 games with top tier NATO means that everyone playing NATO experiences the same low winrate.
He is providing data which 1000th of players can confirm by expirience…
hes not
the guy is endlessly seething about russia for months now lmao
well thats statistically wrong
as many other and me do since yrs…
and u can show your rigged stats over and over again. Its discussed already why this looks different. And there is a reason why most players, especially below lvl 100 are queing on russia in the MM.
are YOUR stats rigged?
it was? well surely you can point me to a discussion then
Everything is rigged if it doesn’t suit your argument.
Probably. Stats are either photoshopped or someone asking their stepbro/stepsis to hack the server and inject the fake numbers just to deceive people bro
Nobody believe this rigged number. 50% russian winrate at 12.7 ? 55 at 10.7-11.3 ?
Good joke
Just play by yourself and see how many times Russia dominates at 10.7. I garantee 153% you’ll get 20-30% winrate against Russia only at most.
those stats are surely rigged right? that projectil guy clearly rigged them
yeah i rigged them myself
i am antons younger brother i do a little server tamepering sometime))
