he’s talking about the 1 in 1M probs of getting ur M829A4 absorbed by a single Relikt, which i doubt if that actually happens that much as they like to claim.
Just to let you know I’m not going to post in the forum anymore. I spend all that time posting and contributing to the discussion but my posts keep getting removed because I vaguely described a technicality of IRL combat footage. If I’m not welcome here, I’m not staying.
Here’s some more.
Yeah a few were bad shots but we don’t talk about that.
Same Abrams surviving 2x KH38, Russian bias i guess.




RUSSIA BAIS. i am the leo…
god damn sweden bais exist
Sweden downgrades their Leopards 2 to 2A4 standart
Welcome to UK solid shot tree
Man your ammo is orange??? Lucky!
If a 6pr shell passed through the ammo itself it only becomes a slightly tinted yellow :(
That LFP shot on 2A4M on Fulda doing zero damage was quite funny. Only a “funni mishap” though, not bias moment.
Wait, I thought 38MTs evaporate everything they get in contact with.
The atoms perfectly aligned I guess.
If you would have used a Russian tank, you would have oneshotted all of those enemies.
i usually dont even get a crit
Look guys, perfect example of bia…, oh wait, vehicle in question isn’t RU so lets ignore this and blame shoddy coding as it’s just a funni mishap.
and more clowns pointing at top tier tanks that dont affect most players ever instead of a nation as a whole trough all brs
How is the abysmal coding of fuel tanks an example for bias?
They do alright for me man usually.
gotta keep grinding out isreal for the helis n such but was working on their air tree.
It’s quite funny man as long as it is RU it’s not bias.
Like t58 for example off the top of me nut.
Imagine a russian tank released the same.
How’d you mean’ like when leopard 1 was 7.3, the Tigers where under BR’d. panthers etc.
Or the US T29 and such at release

