Really depends on why its strong if its just agile due to thrust vectoring and has good missles people wont be that upset but if its stealth is better than the F22 or its DIRCM works perfectly against 5th gen missiles then people will riot lol
3 Likes
side radar are capable of 150-200 km DL, same with the rear radar.
its the stupid wing radar that have like 30km range
On a B-29 maybe lmfao.
its 400km for b52 size. maybe 250 sides
F-22 fanboys inbound, and Su-57 fanboys inbound.
Me knowing the F-22 is over-rated ready to fly the plane anyway. :)
Not true but you can continue in your delusions if you must. Not risking my clearance to explain.
If you take those numbers in a vaccum as the theoretical optimal then sure, but the real deal is going to be dramatically differnt. Zero chance it would be able to lock a stealth fighter in proper aspect outside of 24km and you can confirm that with basic RF math calcs.
This I why I don’t understand why they didn’t just implement the Object 477A.
There’s counterparts available for the Soviet/Russian side, they just chose not to add them.
who said stealth, you got sichzo or what.
if its not stealth at all, then it should face all 4th gen fighter and not 5th gen.
i guess i enjoy my plane and you enjoy you ballon shooter.
So, the annual crying list, I love reading it.
1 Like
F22 leak in the forum because this
This affirmation will and is applied to every vehicle in-game, where the game represents these machines in a non-combat scenario (see mechanical limitations not being represented in many vehicles, autoloading malfunction in some, and reload debuff in the movement to others). Reload time being a, still, hot topic when comparing western to eastern modern designs in ground vehicles, there are variable sources for both autoloaded machinery (some models reload faster in real life than their in-game relatives) and manual loaded machinery (fatigue and other factors that could and does slow down the loader performance while operating the machinery is also not represented).
Although again I believe that Russian bias doesn’t exist. Talking about ground vehicles, the Terminator is widely used as example and potential proof for this, but again I personally think was a dumb move from Gaijin’s end to properly sit a vehicle in a balanced battle rating, this is no exclusivity to the Soviet Union tech tree, XM-800T, FV721 and VIdAr and many others were examples of vehicles that performed out of their scope due to a irregular battle rating, timing as variable, and is about time to the Terminator get a proper battle rating where (don’t put my words on this case) will satisfy the community. Again, Russian bias doesn’t exist.
1 Like
Special mention to Sovetsky Soyuz, still ruining top tier naval.
Got to thank that angry japanase player spamming long lances at them, he’s doing a very fine job i will say
2 Likes
Russian bias, a gaming equivalent to flat earth.
4 Likes
They already are… time and time again we see bug reports being denied because “We believe…”
nerd alert
Ofc there Russian bias they have the best op line up out of all other nations like sure other nations have good line ups but compared to Russian line up their lacking like Russian line up has best of everything, and they get constant updates that includes more Russian vehicles even though they don’t need it, like I see other people complain about T58, HSTVL and Turms III being op like they are acting Russia/Soviet doesn’t have op tanks like PT-76-57, OBJ-279, 2S38, Obj 292 and BMPT terminator like Russian tree has more op tanks than any other nation and I’m just annoyed at the fact NATO tanks especially Leopard and Abrams keeps getting constant nerfs and with the annoying turret baskets when you get hit your just a sitting duck now waiting for 30-40 second repair and no other mbts gets turret baskets like they targeted only leopard and Abrams, realistically every mbt should be competitive with each other.
1 Like
Tell me you’ve never played Russia top-tier yourself without telling me you’ve never played Russia top-tier yourself.
3 Likes
Tell me you aren’t or are a Russian main without telling me you are
Hardly.
Point being: It’s no surprise that the people who complain about Russian Bias have never played Russia themselves.
‘‘Grass is always greener on the other side’’ and all that.
4 Likes
To be fair it looks like no matter what people play the grass seems always greener on the russian side
2 Likes