Be careful when using these percentages. Just to clarify, I want to remind you that the probability of the three main factions all ending up together is extremely low, virtually zero. Secondary factions are driven by the main ones; consequently, they will have a higher win rate regardless of whether the USA is at 54%, Germany at 42.3%, and Russia at 48%, or if the USA is at 42.3%, Germany at 48%, and Russia at 54%. These tables must be interpreted with this in mind, otherwise, it might appear that Italy is on par with or superior to the three main factions which would be quite ridiculous.
I used 12.7 for the exammple but is the same with others BR.
Oh absolutely. Though considering the performance of singular mbts that wont change too much how good a t90 (for example) performs overall, which was the main point of discussion for me. A very low amount of players per match (on average) when youre playing russia for example, or USA in your team will not be of those main nations. The vast majority of your team will stil be playing russia and US in your team.
Considering Winrates id absolutely agree that it has to be taken with several grains of salt. Especially because it seems that some “minor” nations are favorabile queued with certain other main nations. It still show that russia in top tier is far from being as opressive anymore as it was in the last months. Whether that is solely due to the introduction of the m1a2 Trophy and m1a2 Sepv3, who knows. Id guess its mainly because of russia lost quite a good amount of very good players that went and switched to us. But, who knows. After all its good that not only one nation is constantly dominating RB matches in top tier.
Damn 3 matches. Thats a big sample size but im calling it anyways. Dude is learning.
Now its only some time till he realizes that different tanks have different playstyles and that theres certain things they excell at and other things you can do to counter a rushing t80 horde.
One day hell have half the nations grinded and realize that the grass is not always greener on the other side.
Then he’ll maybe play france top tier and begin to question how any paper armored Leclerc, with way worse rounds, with slower reverse but a4 kph fster max forward speed, without ESS, without Proxy fuze HEAT MP, with two smoke pops, 2° worse gun depression, without 50 cals to destroy tracks or even some light tanks and the same reload can be 0.7 BR higher than a m1a1 clickbait or m1a1 HC…
Teach me how to defeat the Pantsir SV oh enlightened one. Showeth on to me why the BMP-T ammo does not detonate or stop it from shooting unlike the PUMA that loses all it’s ammo and give the strength to know that Russian tanks do not and should not have turret baskets and that playing a Russian tank in top tier is the equivalent of playing a reserve tank as they are so truly terrible.
But by that logic average cas idiot will also just die instead of utilizing some tactics and special weaponry.
What if sm sv player happens to have a brain tho?
You are asking a tank main such question lol this is easy to answer. I shoot them with a tank and I love them because they are feeder food bro I hope people spawn more pantsirs to fill my cheap dopamine of target destroyed.
realistically, i dont really understand just why russia has to be as good as it is in most cases, look at 9.3-9.7, most of that shit is much better overall than its contemporaries, especially the SPAA and MBTs
