You fail to understand. If at this moment his crosshair at least vertically was pointed at me
Then he could fight back, but because he were aiming anywhere but at me he digged the ground.
Then he could fight back, but because he were aiming anywhere but at me he digged the ground.
??? Yes he could have fought you before you shot him the first time? But what has that to do with the fact that after your first shot he cant fight back but a T series could in the same situation?
Or are you saying that he could have fought back if he predicted your shot into his power electronics and preaimed his barrel accounting for his loss of vertical and horizontal guidance?
1 Like
T90M2 leaked lets add ts.
2 Likes
Russian Bias went so high up it hit the limit and turned into a negative amount
1 Like
When there’s enemy around cover where do you aim:
-
Sky
-
Ground
-
Enemy?
Do you know whether he knew you were there?
Extremely lucky between Relikt plates shot?
No just M829A4 early access
Yes, he broke my transmission as we were fighting each other with side shots around this rock. But then he decided to drive out like this.
I say it againg in the video I insta dead the moment Abrams sees my side.
But let’s take situation in vacuum. Both of Nato and T tanks land bad shot to each other one breaking autoloader and another breaking basket vice versa. Who defacto still can kill another before repair?
1 Like
yes because you died first shot like the Leclerc could have. If you didnt die just like the Leclerc did then youd have a much, much easier time fighting back in the T series tank.
Just basket vs just autoloader directly after a shot: the Nato tank if its able to hull aim.
If I didn’t die in this moment, but my autoloader would die, I couldn’t fight back at all as I didn’t finish reload.
It already myth busts the whole thing of Nato mbts not having a chance of fighting back. I myself have kill streak of 3 with Abrams basket being broken. But most of people give up early or do things like this leclerc not helping them to gain a chance in situation like this
2 Likes
Fair enough.
Yes it busts said myth in that one specific situation crafted by you. It does however not invalidate the fact that a carousel autoloader tank does not suffer from the same artificial restrictions most other tanks do in that regard.
I don’t know, each to their own. One can’t reload, another can’t aim with turret. I experienced them all and had all kind of situations with one or another being better in different in game scenarios
1 Like
Yes because Gaijin need to take care the Rus and China leaving other nation 20+ years behing making the game incredible idiotic with survivability of Ruskie and MaoMao
DM53 and up was design to punch throu ERA and do it perfectly in game is another bs ammo not to mention DM63 and M829A3
- the armor on nato tanks Composide armor is so bad that Ruskie can go throu front uper plate of any Nato tank
T90M proven Bricks inside armor and Era papers in side’s not to mention Bradley kill it with HE in the game indestructible and this Propaganda stats from Wiki and Export companys like Rosoboronexport
desparate acts done in war aren’t exactly reliable sources
3 Likes
No reliable source ofc
Still more armor than the abram turret ring
1 Like
Yes Top secret Armor on Abrams but brochure armor on Rus and China
Every think working as intended very realistic
The t-90m is useless in game, it’s also extremely ugly. Worst mbt at top tier bro