I made a list of win and loses in the last two days and there is a pattern. Britain 12.7: 5 loses when i play against russia. And Two of them so hard that already the second respawn was absolutely senseless, because the whole spawnpoint was only a target practicing for the enemy team. And one of that five my team pushed hard, win 75% control of the map until to the enemies spawnoint, than 5 mins later get pushed so extremly back, that we lose the game without any base.
0 wins against russian team
2 wins with russian team
Total 7 Battles over two days in Toptier. Russain bias exist.
Russian ERA is ridiculous OP. Especially if you try to penetrate the turret from the side. Reloadtime is to good for Russian Tanks.
LMURs are also so stupid. A guy had only one Kill and spawned instant after that with that Heli and what? 14 Fire and Forget insta Kill rockets?
The only good thing i can say after 4 Months of not palying WT is: I can now onehit a BMPT from the side. But need 5 Shots from the front, if i cant see his belly.
Iam sure the official stastics are rigged. You can easily match the 50% winning rate by combining the different nations clever with RU.
That in practically any other Nations Tech Tree are russian models says also a lot. Every a Premium model.
Mi 28NM only has 8
and that is an issue with heli SP costs in general
all other F&F and/or LDIRCM helis are equally bad
Russian tanks have some of the worst reloads at top tier
No, it has an auto loader that can sometimes tank shots, and the reload rate doesnt get affected if it is down to 2 crew members. 6 seconds or 7 ish seconds is so much better than leopard reload. Keep coping
Guess what happens when you lose 2 crew members on t tanks. Also post stats
war thunder players vs screen recording who wins
“Russian tanks have some of the worst reloads at top tier”
You: “No”
What are you on about lul
Also, upgrade your crew you nitwit
Ironic when it’s usually you with the skill issue coping.
As usual, that nato bros has activated his Ego Protection Mode, instead of admitting a lack of skill, it’s easier to start projecting and blaming others just so he feels safer for his pride lol.
Its funny to try and defend the most biased and overpowered nation in the game, funny that even tho the autoloader of the T series can eat shots very well u had to say “It has the worst reload at top tier”
Well, its known that the reload of the nato tanks (without autoloader) Can be downed to 8 or 10 seconds while being 5 or 6 seconds with full crew. U cant compare what happens when 2 crewmembers die in a T series tank and in a nato tank, cuz Ive never seen any nato tank eat apfsds from the sides like russian tanks does, T-series tanks crew are basicly one of the best protected tankcrews in game rn.
And what about the bmpt? That sh1 eats more apfsds to the side than any nato mbt from the front, Its magical blow out panel (For any reason to Pro-russian Gaijin the crew sitting on top of hundreds of 30MM rounds its the same as the abrams seperate compartement of ammo…), and ofc the classification that none IFV in game has “Portable missile carrier”, Ofc, cuz how can Gaijin let its majestuosity of russian vehicle only had 4 missiles (that work pretty well) unlike the Namers, Pumas, etc etc.
Look mate i could say a bunch of reasons of why Gaijin its pro-russian and tryes to improve its fav nation every update changing every single small techinical detail, its just hilarious
“If I never have seen something therefore it doesn’t exist”
The point is never “IF” you can use a vehicle,a vehicle can be bad and still do good if the one playing it its capable of using it
Its a matter of easy on average is to actually play a vehicle on a low skill level and Russian vehicles from experience do get lucky bounces or some random NO DAMAGE after pen since Russia is the main nation that actually benefits from volumetric banana code
If you would remove volumetric you will not suffer from actual “Russian bias”
Oh, SEVEN whole battles?
Well clearly that’s a large enough sample size to draw major conclusions from!
What’s that? Statshark has hundreds of thousands of battles on record? Oh no, those must be rigged and your 7 battles are clearly more representative of the reality of top-tier winrates than the experience of tens of thousands of other players.
/s
buddy, ive been playing since 2021, 4k hours on steam i have germany, russia, GB, and israel top tier i think ive seen a lot (and experienced with russian tanks)
And what does that supposed to mean? If you haven’t seen NATO tank eating dart than it doesn’t mean that it doesn’t exist.
And appealing to the time of playing…
My 7k battles with good results against your bad results with 10k. What do you want to say?
That’s mostly a T-90M thing, and even then I only have it happen maybe in 15/100 shots. Besides, LFP shots still one-tap it consistently and breech/turret roof shots completely cripple the thing too.
The T-80BVM blows up reliably, as do any of the other high tier MBT’s like the T-80U-E1, T-72B3, T-90A, etc. etc.
As always, I suspect that aim is a bigger problem in this equation than the survivability of Russian MBT’s is.
Once again compiled data on every shot taken against a Russian vehicle.
Every single shot (save for ONE at 2:05) that could’ve/should’ve one-shot a Russian vehicle, did one-shot a Russian vehicle.
Confirmation bias.
You’re biased to believe it happens with Russian tanks, but not NATO tanks, so you’ll dismiss it when it does happen with NATO tanks.
Meanwhile, when you put aside your biases and keep track of all shots, you get frequent nonsense on NATO tanks too:
Is that why the M1A2 Trophy-HV and SEP v3 are MASSIVELY superior tanks to the T-90M Arena-M?
That’s the equivalent of:
Nice collage, most of this shooting to +82 angled armor plates isnt pretty predictable ?
How can u say this when The aps of it has like 7 charges just on one side?? wtf bro
As u say buddy, but im only trying to say that ive got a time playing on the game, its very rare to see an apfsds bounce or get eaten by the side of a nato MBT, if i made a collage of all the T series tanks that ate my shells i could make three of those like u sent.
The autoloader of the T series tanks can eat apfsds shells half the time without destroying it, but when u penetrate a nato tank instantly goes out of horizontal drive cuz of “Gaijins balance” anyway does that justify that all the 30mm bushmaster + spikes light tanks behave like shit (Talking about rate of fire of bushmaster lower than irl and AOA of the spike missile) meanwhile the LMUR does use an actual good AOA and the BMPs 30mm uses its real life rate of fire ? and what about the invisible blowout panel of the bmpt??? and what about the Kh missiles? they have only seen a convention… What about giving russia the buk such a nice SPAA and very well paired with the other SPAA from those updates? oh no… it seem like germany got the irist that was better so they had to give russia the pantsir SM-SV with fucking 96 missiles,. At that point, why dont u give Israel the iron dome? or give USA the patriot? bruhh
Its not just me, there is a lot of players that say that the T series tanks ates apfsds to the sides like nothing, mainly because of the era and the fuel tanks cuz i dont know why but russian fuel tanks are quite hard… its very weird, and the fact that u that u have being playing since 10 years ago and chose to defend an overpowered and biased nation that 50% of the playerbase plays its kinda bad for u, if the matchmaking is already f up that we have to play russia agains russia, what will happen if they keep buffing it and the playerbase decides to leave the nations they started with to play russia??? Russia thunder?? Russian civil war? cmon mate, think about it
All of that photo collage about NATO tanking shots but hear me the fuck out:
Constructive forum users here.
T-80 BVM and T90mARENA #23 and 24 sorted by K/D, both below 50% WR
Your worst performing Top tier MBT sorted by K/D…T90M and Leo2PL
Literally no one in esports matches picks T80/t90s over Abrams.
Now i wont deny theres sketchy stuff happening on russian tanks (and also but maybe not as much on every other tank in the entire game) and weird additions to the ru tech tree that are magnitudes better than comparable counterparts in other nations. But if its the “sometimes eating darts at shots where they shouldnt” brings you to that conclusion, why do you completely dismiss that even IF thats the case on a much more regular basis than on other tanks (which isnt proven) they still do much worse than almost every other MBT?