The mass doesn’t really do much, since post pen is mostly determined by residual penetration.
The higher velocity of M829A2/KE-W A2 does make them considerably easier to snipe with.
I mean if youre not figthing russia youre probably better off with the A2 due to the higher muzzle velocity, that being said wasnt there an export version the the A3? If so they could give it to the british one
1 Like
Get too close and the there is a good chance the trophy just ignores the missile fired at you.
I already had it happen after the update, wasn’t even particularly close to the enemy BMPT.
Yeah KE-T or something? or KE-W A3?
However I think it’s fine how it currently is. The tank in it’s original nation should be slightly better than it’s “copy&paste” (for the lack of a better term) counterpart in a different nation imo.
Mass actually does literally nothing for APFSDS past 76mm in calibre.
2 Likes
Yes. A fast missile like the Ataka(~300 meters per second at ~200m) can go through below around ~100m of range because the system has a reaction time of 300ms. I’d say the bigger menace is that the BMPT can overload the APS by shooting multiple missiles.
KE-T. Made in ~2012. Tungsten copy of M829A3. KE-W A3 is a short-lived improvement of KE-W A2 made between ~2008-2012
2 Likes
Doesn’t it make it slower?
That’s because that camo net in the picture is missing 2 US flag decals on both sides. So democracy can’t protect if its not on your tank.
it doesn’t affect what’s important, namely spall damage
When the skilled players finally flock back to America for once.
Yep, & it’ll be interesting if they stay, move to a different tech tree, or back to lifting up the Soviets’ mediocre tanks.
3 Likes
Russia get new MBT, USA get new MBT. That is fair. Differences in performance are due to player skill factors.But when Russia got two Pantsir systems, the USA got nothing
1 Like
When the Russians began to use helicopters in the game, the situation was no different from what it had been before.
1 Like
That’s incredibly disingenuous
And because the Abrams is just simply miles better than the T-90M.
1 Like
No, My point is a reasonable analysis based on actual data.The data shows that if you use a Russian tank for two kills and use the MI28NM, you can win 55 out of 100 games
1 Like
That’s not how the statistics read.
The statistics read they’re more likely to spawn a helicopter on winning matches.
1 Like
In the more game data of M1, this aspect was not reflected. Maybe the new M1 is indeed stronger, but it will take time to be fully confirmed. However, this does indeed compensate for some of the disadvantages that USA had when facing KH38 LMUR Pantsir
1 Like
You’re cutting out many games played by limiting it to just helis, not to mention there’s not even 1% of a difference between Russia’s wr and a couple others there.
What you’re doing is spreading misinformation
However, it cannot be concluded that the 440000 helicopter data is invalid. I have not denied your Data. I merely provided some additional data. The fighter jet data includes the air mode, so I do not intend to present it
1 Like
People were genuinely calling this piece of trash better than pantsir btw, happens every match i think ive had a single match where aim9x’s were working consistently, absolute dogcrap