So, MiG-29M is far from biased. (MiG-29s are literally meme’d to be the vehicle that gaiiin hates the most)
29M specifically is still missing half its countermeasures, it was never built or planned to run the cm setup is has in-game .
Good but far from great.
Su-33 is one of the best 13.0s but uh, 48 countermeasures so there’s a skill floor.
Good luck against seeker shutoff or datalinked Fox-1s
Bro so I made a bit of progress down the UK tech tree, challenger 2 ain’t as bad as people claims, definitely overall worse than M1A1. The one that is harder to do well I think is the type 90.
nice man, i mean maybeeeee i was over reacting just a tad when i saw the modules i can still play them alright but its mostly the power electronics that i hate the basket isnt to bad
Ive 9 out of 10 trees at 11.7 and up.
Cr2s are definitely thr worst top tier mbts especially after the latest changes.
Hell a 30mm can take out tbe turret drive with a breach pem
No statistically the cr2 is worse.than them.
Ariete only has worse armour.
Has citv, gen 2 commander and gunner thermals, lws, better round, larger ready rack, far better mobility
My experience so far the armor has been solid especially the turret, I would even rate the turret protection being very good, it managed to bounce a bunch of shots at 11.7 matchmaking. The ones that doesn’t have any armor is type 90 lol that thing simply cannot take a hit anywhere, compare to Challenger 2 their armor are night and day difference. I’m going to have more matches to see how consistent it is, this point I would rate the turret armor being #2 just under T-80U, mbt2000 is close.
Same, To this day, I still haven’t finished the Japan tree because I don’t understand how people manage to play the Type 90. I just can’t make that thing work. It feels like being trapped in a cramped cage. I don’t feel confident enough to push forward, flank, or capture points. It’s really difficult to use, not to mention the JM33 ammo, which is absolutely terrible.