Ask them. It’s a new release, and people also want to test the Trophy.
SEP V3 has 60-70% winrates because veterans have come back, but in a month or 2 the trend will go back to “”“normal”“” and the U.S. will remain with 40% winrates at every top tier GRB BRs.
Don’t expect it will change everything and give you an argument to affirm U.S.A is good ingame lol.
Yes, but for some… it’s the only problem…
Russian tanks are mid! Oh the tragedy! I guess its because theyre full of modelling mistakes and lack of care in how their systems are supposed to work, especially in our tank only gamemode means that russia has been sufferring very much i wager
Nonsense.
Are you high ? Do you live in California ? I hope you’re not currently behind the wheel.
Nobody understands what you’re rambling about.
Test the trophy, you mean the APS system that has been in game for 4 years now?
Almost like good players recognize good tanks.
Guess we will have to wait and see.
Any tank looks like a demigod if the forum user, like SadRIPer, is bad enough lol.
t-90m useless. can’t kill a hull down abrams. the best hits only barrel/breech damage and none goes beyond crew damage. after so many hits he still have four healthy crews with 100% health.
inb4 krill issue, should have gotten a gaming underwear with led lights bro
Trueee.
Where can I get one?
A comment concerning Gaijin giving the F2 to Leclercs and considering it pens way less than the F1, which is the actual first version of the said dart ?
A logical thought behind that ? Maybe a little bit of russian cope to explain it as well ?
It is political, don’t ever tell me there is no russian bias in this game. They give unfair advantages to Russia and artificially/shadow buff NATO stuff on purpose.
t-90m being useless and 3bm60 also useless, can’t even pen an abrams that is well-known to be having pepper chicks
two deaths with 0 kill and no wins. no chance in hell vs USA now with 10 Abrams and each one will kick the t-90m ass easily if they ain’t orange cat.
regarding the gaming gadgets, I try it first then update if it somehow make my t-90m goes positive bro
Ok Ivan.
Give F2 to Leclercs which actually pens less than the first version of it, the F1. To counterbalance that, give Russia a second APS MBT, buffed Relikts and a stock dart which pens more than the previous one, while still benifiting from 6sec reload.
Then ask all french mains why they’re bad.
EDIT: don’t forget : also, give french mains Tiger helicopters which still have 8 Spike missiles while the german one has 12 PARS, for whatever reason. Give them an IFV with MMPs which don’t hit anything, and counterbalance that as well by giving the U.S. + Russia +1 APS MBT.
Then ask the french mains why they’re bad.
You’re a joke man.
Leopard 2A5 & T-90M moment.
I have the same advice I’ve given players for every heavily armored turret tank: Retreat, change plans, execute new plan.
No one is forcing you to take on a hull-down tank in ground matches, maps are designed in a way that allows you to play them without that requirement.
Just wait until bro finds out what stock dart the Abrams got.
A lot of them are just wildly overconfident in their capabilities screaming “but I’m a french main”.
wait, that sounds exactly like a considerably less extreme and less delusional version of you.
Keep in mind USA got the third best penning top tier round in the entire game (M829A2), stock.
A round vastly superior to everything except M829A3 and DM53…
Keep in mind, this round is stock…
A very much unneeded addition (M829A1 would have been fine) but I’m taking it because it’s funny asf
Just wait until bro finds out what stock dart the Abrams got.
I don’t care about Abrams. Explain why they gave Leclercs the F2 which pens less than the F1, beside that being political and the will to give unfair advantages to Russia (in this case, nerfing a NATO MBT).
You have no rational explanation, because the truth is the employer despises France because of what we’re doing in Ukraine.
But, I don’t care about Abrams.
This discussion is not about Abrams, it’s about Leclercs. Are the U.S. the only member of NATO ? No.
Because they wanted to give the Leclerc a better stocl shell.
Unless you preferred if they would have kept G1 as it’s stock round?
i have zero desire to get the one with aps now because it is on a same useless platform with -0.000000000000000001 kph reverse speed. and then you have the slowest reload in the multiverse bro it was a single cap and only way to get to the objective is to kill that super tank abrams else he will deny your ass bro. but I do feel very excited on getting the new abrams bro
So, what about the rafale debacle?
The plane that still is the most handheld POS op plane in the game?
It is literally so good that playing it actually reduces your skill level due to overreliance on its features (still gets a 75% winrate easily)
With a Fox-3 that has a better seeker than every other modern Fox-3 cause reasons?
First missile to be launched in TRK MEM too.
Unless you preferred if they would have kept G1 as it’s stock round?
Yes, it would have been the logical thing to do ?
And give the F2 the additionnal pen it deserves (which is historically accurate, btw) ?
So when it comes to Russia, sometimes historically accurate stuff is primordial (when it gives them an advantage), and some other times some equipments added to them come from very questionnable and flexibles sources. BUT when it comes to NATO (in this case, France), the number of credible sources presented during the bug report wasn’t enough, and considered “not credible”, “not reliable sources”. Same with the SEP Abrams, months, years of bug reports, just to give them a 30mm buff to the hull.
There is an obvious preference for Russia in this game, tell me otherwise.
You’re so dishonest you used the “stock dart” argument. Pathetic.
I’m done talking, I think anybody who reads this understand there is an obvious bias in the game.
