It already has been bug reported, and the response of Russianjin was : “The magic calculator says otherwise”.
Again : when it comes to Russia, they accept to buff ERAs, DARTs, engines, missiles, EVERYTHING, even with questionnable and very flexible sources.
When it comes to NATO : magic calculator said no.
Russia Thunder it is.
1 Like
Give the F2 the massive additionnal pen it deserves first Ivan, then we’ll talk about the russian dart being able to pen ERAs or not.
Always the double standard in this game. That’s why it’s dying, people have had enough of this
1 Like
When did this happen exactly?
You mean primary sources stating something you don’t like?
1 Like
I am pretty sure the formula gaijin uses is public info.
Should be simple enough to double check using said formula if the math is correct or not.
Since the penetration of all top tier apfsds uses this formula, this is the one we should use in bug reports.
It would be double standard to use this formula for every dart, but then demand we use idk what formula they used in the French bug report since eit fits your agenda.
Keeps things universal for all darts (similar to how Fox-3’s all share the same seeker, EXCEPT the MICA for some god awful reason)
2 Likes
I’ve been waiting for Super Tucano for years.
Got a list of cool aircraft and tanks that I’ll play to death.
Whenever I look at Soviet ground, I just see a T-90M and BVM, and neither are as fun as even Challenger 2 to me.
Yeah, my teams sometimes have BMPTs ruining my win rate, but I have a blast regardless.
@SadRIPer
The APFSDS calculator is Swiss, not Russian.
Two Swiss mathematicians made it, and it’s the most accurate equation on the planet.
RD-33 [engine] bug reports have never been accepted, despite primary sources used.
Soviet darts have never changed.
The only changes to missiles were after half a dozen sources.
ERA has received no buffs, the side-mounted ERA was bugged, which means the source for the bug was the game itself. Identical to M6A1’s turret armor being bugged.
Switzerland is suddenly aligned with Russia now watch
2 Likes
They’re exceptions since they are early Fox-3’s.
Only modern air-launched Fox-3’s are really relevant
But you’re not wrong, they also have different seekers
Ok Vladimir, you’re so biased in your thoughts it’s not even worth to argue with you.
The game is gonna die anyway, everything already given to Russia or not. That’s what you’re gonna earn
Fuck, I’m having a brain fart rn.
Multitasking irl XD
1 Like
Its still there man, before i run out of forum time.
The cr2 nerfed into the ground, J22 being added go russia wirh +22km range munitions.
The fact they’ve been near dominant for the past what 6 months?
The abrams is nice but they’ve also fked that addition as well as nerfing it at the same time
5 Likes
No, it’s clearly stated in the post, it’s hidden to the public and appears to only advantage Russia conveniently enough.
Stop trying to find a justification to this Vladimir. They have their magical russian table giving good stuff to Russia and bad pen to everyone else, that’s the truth.
Thank you.
Give it 2 months and the Russian CAS/ Spaa problem will he back into the limelight
4 Likes
I’m honestly scared how bad it’s going to be once more people start using mixed loadout of Kh-38MT and Kh-31PD.
Sprinkle that with MITL LMUR next patch. Circus incoming.
3 Likes
Almost every nation (besides Sweden) will get it.
Even SM-SV can’t deal with MITL. (NATO nations would be best off with MITL on helis simply because they have more munitions to spam as decoys)
Why the actual hell is gaijin even considering this.
It should have never even been tested in dev server to begin with, or left the drawing board
Probably the best option.
@SadRIPer
“Hidden to the public.”
The Swiss mens’ website: NATO APFSDS penetration is pretty much accurate
https://www.longrods.ch/perfcalc.php
How does that help in air RB? 9.0 is it air RB BR.
2 Likes