Unless you preferred if they would have kept G1 as it’s stock round?
Yes, it would have been the logical thing to do ?
And give the F2 the additionnal pen it deserves (which is historically accurate, btw) ?
So when it comes to Russia, sometimes historically accurate stuff is primordial (when it gives them an advantage), and some other times some equipments added to them come from very questionnable and flexibles sources. BUT when it comes to NATO (in this case, France), the number of credible sources presented during the bug report wasn’t enough, and considered “not credible”, “not reliable sources”. Same with the SEP Abrams, months, years of bug reports, just to give them a 30mm buff to the hull.
There is an obvious preference for Russia in this game, tell me otherwise.
You’re so dishonest you used the “stock dart” argument. Pathetic.
I’m done talking, I think anybody who reads this understand there is an obvious bias in the game.
Even a lot of French mains have said that the pen advantages of F2 only really was at ranges that barely happen in game, which would make F2 barely an upgrade over F1 even with it’s correct pen. So I don’t know what kind of extra penetration you are expecting?
Sweden, Colombia, Italy, China, Japan again, and USA. All with better top lineups for me as well [I don’t play CAS, so only the tank lineups matter to me].
It’s explained here, with the sources, how good the pen would have been, if it was treated impartially and applied the same specs it has IRL.
Sources: Jane’s, French official documents, GIAT/Nexter material and historical data that have been cited for years when talking about Leclerc ammunition.
I am pretty sure the formula gaijin uses is public info.
Should be simple enough to double check using said formula if the math is correct or not.
Since the penetration of all top tier apfsds uses this formula, this is the one we should use in bug reports.
It would be double standard to use this formula for every dart, but then demand we use idk what formula they used in the French bug report since eit fits your agenda.
Keeps things universal for all darts (similar to how Fox-3’s all share the same seeker, EXCEPT the MICA for some god awful reason)
I’ve been waiting for Super Tucano for years.
Got a list of cool aircraft and tanks that I’ll play to death.
Whenever I look at Soviet ground, I just see a T-90M and BVM, and neither are as fun as even Challenger 2 to me.
Yeah, my teams sometimes have BMPTs ruining my win rate, but I have a blast regardless.
@SadRIPer
The APFSDS calculator is Swiss, not Russian.
Two Swiss mathematicians made it, and it’s the most accurate equation on the planet.
RD-33 [engine] bug reports have never been accepted, despite primary sources used.
Soviet darts have never changed.
The only changes to missiles were after half a dozen sources.
ERA has received no buffs, the side-mounted ERA was bugged, which means the source for the bug was the game itself. Identical to M6A1’s turret armor being bugged.
No, it’s clearly stated in the post, it’s hidden to the public and appears to only advantage Russia conveniently enough.
Stop trying to find a justification to this Vladimir. They have their magical russian table giving good stuff to Russia and bad pen to everyone else, that’s the truth.
