We’re playing war thunder not just any game.
They aren’t fake. They need direct proof that they are compatible, usable and relevant on the specific vehicle. It’s something entirely different to a fake agm or fake ammo belts. And most importantly, it’s a consistent rule.
Definitely not the case.
Prototype US vehicle has been funded and developed by the US and as such is a property of US.
Sweden trialing T-80U for an hour or two definitely doesn’t come even close to that.
I knew you wouldn’t get it, so this feels pointless.
Still just an ordinary game.
They’re fake as those countries don’t operate 64Es with LDIRCM.
I thought vehicles of all nations should be represented in a realistic manner.
Yes, it’s absolutely insane seeing a community of so called realism-hunters being fine with systematic rules that break realism. But yeah, if it’s a “rule” then it surely can’t be totally fake and illogical.
It’s really easy to handwave fakes when it doesn’t positively affect the one nation you don’t like.
Not with the way vehicles are added to the game. There are rules and standards that other games don’t have.
No you just don’t understand what fake is. A vehicle getting equipment that’s proven that it can be used is not fake. It follows the general trajectory of Gaijin making vehicles their best possible version independent of procurement, budget and maintenance.
A Dutch 64E with LDIRCM and JAGMs is just the best version of itself with equipment that it can use. Just like a T80U with Thermals.
A BMPT with a separated ammo belt is not the best version of itself since the belt literally doesn’t exist that way. And the same applies to a MI28NM with 8 LMURs and a LDIRCM that can affect missiles anywhere besides the bottom back of the heli. Same with the other stuff above.
It’s 2 completely different things and once again the first one is consistent for everyone, the latter is only there to make russian shitboxes competitive.
Every post serves as proof that Russian bias truly exists
That’s ironic.
I do, them being wrapped in a carefully planned “rule” doesn’t change anything.
So it follows the general trajectory of giving artificial buffs to nations and their vehicles, good to know.
Wait, Dutch 64Es shouldn’t have JAGMs as well ?
How so?
It follows the general rule that vehicle get into the game in their best possible state according to proof of technical compatibility. Not that every vehicle can just get completely made up bs that partially defies physics like russian stuff does. If you can’t see a difference between these 2 things then I can’t help you.
Pretty sure they put in a foreign military sales request but they aren’t in service yet.
M6A1 had a bug fixed in one day.
RD-33 engine historical reports never get acted on.
These stories aren’t exclusive to one tech tree, all tech trees experience every story ever said.
These have nothing to do with the actual existence of Russia bias . The reason for this difference can only be that the latter lacks sufficient data.
The latter has GDR unclassified data on Mig-29 9.12.
It’s a primary source and widely distributed.
F-4J can have its radar be PD instead of PDV due to a bug, the bug report on it has been ignored.
Using bug reports as “evidence” only disproves Russian bias, because all tech trees have and do experience the same things in that subject.
Yes, so I did not use the bug report as evidence of Russian bias.The evidence of Russian bias lies in their exceptional game performance, as well as their increased number and strength of equipment.
skill issues in 2026?
And what about the stuff that other tech trees dont experience?
if people think Russian bais is real they need to press uninstall - USA main
also u guys have been going at this since the beginning of the year 😭
So now you’re citing skill.
You know who had exceptional game performance for over a year after T-80BVM was added?
Sweden & USA. USA had the exceptional game performance from 2019 - 2022.
You know what changed between 2022 - present for the ground meta? Nothing.
The meta of MBTs & mobility has been a part of top BR ground since at least 2019, and draining the spawn points of the enemy faster than your team.
USA got OP CAS ahead of others, and “coincidentally” when USA got OP CAS, their win rate fell off.
Japan got CAS akin to Soviets, and “coincidentally” their win rate fell off.
& people can be blame the SPAA, but SPAA requires someone to choose to spawn in an aircraft over more MBTs.
Such as? So far, I’ve seen zero things.
Overlapping plates of the ERA containers? That’s just overlapping plates causing shenanigans, partly due to servers.
Ammo belts that separate when they shouldnt so the vehicle is less susceptible to ammo explosions.
LDIRCM emitters that can shoot through helicopter fuselages.
Just getting double the amount of missiles than there are actual sources for
Stuff like that?
Also your not a usa main yourself you went hunting usa in other nations
biggest rage bait fourm staying on this for months just choose a side guys
Russia gets BMPT USA gets T58 , Russia gets su-34 USA gets f15E , Russia gets t90M USA gets sepv3 I dont see an inch of bais all I see is issues