That’s just them being fine with fakes and artificial buffs, which are the things you are seemingly against.
It’s still an artificial buff wrapped in shiny foil so it looks nicer. We’ve established the fact that artificial buffs happen across the board, but this forum only really talk about those if it affects a certain nation.
Tanks being stuck with older shells is a different story, as nations in question have access to currently used shells as well, unlike the Dutch that aren’t in possession of LDIRCM for 64E.
Ariete with DM53 is similar though, as I doubt they ever procured that round.
Neither of them have a separation inside the belt which is the important part. You can also look at the temu terminator in the Chinese tree. Same ammo layout, no separation.
Probably but the 64e and z10 could cover in a sphere if the azimuth of the emitter is 90°+, the mi28nms coverage is entirely impossible
No. Proof is needed that each pylon can fire the specific weapon in the specific configuration which is why the tiger uht can carry only the 2 pars launchers on the outer wing station and not the 4 pars one. Or the EFT that only gets spice racks on the inner station and only Harm on the outer and no Amraams on the inner and middle.
Yes because those artificial buffs don’t follow established rules, are complete fantasy without any grounding in reality and are shrouded in complete silence and mystery by Gaijin. That’s why people have a problem not because they’re buffs for Russia.
All nations get pampered by the rule that’s the point. And no just because you solely care about gameplay impact doesn’t mean that everyone else and gaijin see it the same way, for everything besides pure gameplay the type of artificial buff plays a huge role.
Some definitely much, much more than others, especially the one that’s hated around here.
If Gaijin didn’t want them to be competitive at 13.0 they wouldn’t get LDIRCM and IR JAGMs.
Apparently they want everyone to have something up there, even if it that doesn’t align with reality.
That’s seemingly fine until certain someone gets to have it’s turn.
also have you guys ever checked Alvis sessions his most recent one he was using mig21 which I have not issue with mig21 but he spent 6 months defending Russian bais not existing yet he uses Russian vehicles (I have no issue with that) but guys I think its time to accept your skill issues
You’re still not getting it. The gameplay impact is whatever the buff is. The problems are behind that. How do you bug report a completely made up buff ? And more importantly where is the limit? Can Gernany demand a fake ldircm for the uht because Russia gets fake missiles? The technical compatibility rule allows for balance without creating these problems.
Dude… that’s a mass restriction, not a weapon restriction.
It only proves the point within my posts that if store positions are wired for AGMs that AGMs can go there.
Do you actually know that it’s a mass restriction? No you don’t. You guessed. That’s why actual proof is so important and conveniently ignored the Eurofighter example. And the same question would apply for example spikes on the inner wing station of the Uht. They are AGMs and the French tiger can carry them so why doesn’t the German one get any and vice versa?
Cause I don’t have knowledge of the Typhoon’s wiring system & memorization of store positions.
My stance remains identical though: If there is error it should be alleviated; however Typhoon will not change the rule if it is an exception.
Your last question is a false equivalence fallacy.
We’ve been talking about singular examples this entire time, not different examples.
France & Germany have unique nonsense with their specific Tiger variants that have been proven in documents, the same proof your post claimed was proving a negative & isn’t needed.
There is no error as per the sources we have. That’s my point. For the efts loadout to change we’d need proof that the different pylons can carry these weapons. For the Mi28NM this apparently doesn’t apply. There is no mistake, just a double standard where every vehicle needs specific proof for every weapon and every pylon but the mi28nm (and the su30sms to a certain degree) just get it on assumption.
It’s the same situation. The respective Tigers get the Spike or Pars due to what we have sources for not based on a simple assumption that pylons are interchangeable regarding weapons of the same class.
