Bug thunder
That’s… a first.
That probably shouldn’t be a first…
Someone somewhere screwed up a damage model for the first time to that extent.
I thought T-44-100 missing a roof, & Merkava Mk4 LIC & IS-6 having double plates were weird, but that… that’s just confusing.
Which is 9 years old and Gaijin literally told us that its fake and that itll be replaced as soon as they can fill that BR same as the German fake tanks.
Also comparing an allegedly real missile of the 21st century with an obscure WW2 tank really speaks volumes, doesnt it?
3 Likes
Ignoring one claim in favor of othere is the exact saim thing you blaim Gajin for…
Yeah I remmember that… there was photo of an additional double launcher.
In all fairness that only prove that there are plates… In all the conversation (even on reddit) there is no proof of those “plates” even being part of the amor moduls (even the picture say’s “damage modul” and you can see the crew in it). The code can say otherwise, idk.
Is that supposed to make it less of an issue?
The IR X-38 isn’t real and the Ho-Ri isn’t real, that’s the point
Ho-Ri isn’t guilty of ruining an entire BR bracket though… nor have I ever seen people actually and actively avoiding playing the tier where it is present solely to avoid it.
The Kh-3Fake? Yeah…
It’s such a braindead vehicle to play lol, and you can’t prevent it in the same way you can prevent aircraft carrying X-38MTs from spawning by just killing the tanks of the players that can do so early, I suggest you try the tank if you haven’t yet, I think it really does have the ability to ruin a good amount of matches for others
??? My point is that there literally is no source stating 8 LMURs on the MI28NM ever. There are only sources for 4.
Yes exactly. It needed specific proof that you could mount PARS on the outer wing Pylon. If the UHT and other Helis got the same treatment as the MI28NM they all could have their inner wing launchers just copy and pasted on the outer ones.
Plates that arent there on the in game Xray which is the important part.
Yes, because the rules changed which is why the Tiger II 105, Panther II and Coelian got removed from research which was before the KH38MT got added. And the HO RI will be removed as soon as Gaijin deems it ok just like the RY2Ys. There are actual statements from Gaijin regarding these fakes but not for the KH38MT.
I’m not really convinced this will happen any time soon if it’s been 9 years, but I admire the optimism
I mean it took about 10 years for the R2Y2s to go so its not out of the ordinary but with these fakes at least we had information, transparency and explanation. We got none of that for the 38MT.
Rules get bent or created just to fill the gaps with fakes.
They did fill the gaps with fakes. They dont anymore since we got subtrees and the standards are much higher nowadays especially for modern equipment. The 38MT is an absolute exception among all weapons from the same BR and timeframe.
You remember F-16AJ, Swedish T-80U and Mi-28 ?
Yes all pre subtree additions like i said. Also not really fake since trialed seems to be a very weird thing when it comes to Gaijin.
Swedish T-80U does not exist and thus is fake and will remain fake until you show us some procurement documents.
By “trialed” you mean a nonsense rule introduced by Gaijin to justify adding fakes ?
Yes pretty much. I also think its stupid and im glad that they stopped doing it and instead pivoted to subtrees. But again there is explanation and transparency unlike the MT.
But the swedish T-80U was addet with the Finnish subtree, not before that…
Which changes absolutely nothing for gameplay itself.
You mean THIS T-80U?
Or the imaginary tank they used for terrain trials? Certainly more historic evidence of it existing and in use than other things we could mention. However I forget - it’s only dodgy marketing brochures you accept as ‘documentary evidence’.
Report from terrain trials with T-80U – Swedish tank archives
Yeah - totally see how it’s just like the KH-3Fake…
(Said no one ever).