Russian Bias in 2026?

relikt was underperforming :D

pantsir yeah

don’t really care for the rest, it’s all mostly ancient history (excluding KH38MT)

1 Like

Of course not, nor do I claim it to be this stop all magical element. However it must have a fairly drastic effect on KE rounds or they wouldn’t have bothered putting it on the turret cheeks

Wheres you’re primary source that tells us exactly how much protection Relikt should have?

And the Rest of it still affects the game considering only the mig 27k and Pantsir thing are outdated lol.

But really your question is “Besides all of the things Gajin did before and continues to do what have they done right now that is biased”

2 Likes

says Russian bias isn’t real calls examples of it when given ancient history

2 Likes

its low effort ragebait.

1 Like

Deadass fr fr on god no cap

i typed a whole thing then realised i can just say “the turret cheeks are substantially thicker”

yeah im talkin about russian bias in 2026 cuhhh

Lol that is true however they could get the same effect with simple high carbon steel, why would they bother with such a potentially toxic metal like DU?

DU is heavier but offers ~1.5x the ME while High carbon steel also suffers from not rly doin much against heat (while DU climbs to 3x ME (!))

It definitely is a ragebait post. It took years, but people is finally realizing that the thing went beyond just a meme.

1 Like

Yeah but the cheeks were already immune to any heat thrown at it. And outside of a few NATO rounds there’s nothing that could pen them. Why would they bother with DU at all if the shattering effect wasn’t fairly significant.

im seeing too many of these ragebaiters, we got this guy and the alvis guy.

1 Like

i think you’ll find in the 100% accurate MMO WAR THUNDERtm 3bm60 goes thru unprotected cheeks. they made the change with the free to play MMO WAR THUNDERtm in mind.

1 Like

Alvis is stupid but he’s not a rage baiter, he genuinely believes everything he types

i am ragebaiting but im correct sooo, truth baiting? idk.

lol it all makes sense now

1 Like

unplayable dogshit on SU-27 release XDDDDDD 9ms on 16c’s and ja-39s were THE META, the unstoppable missile shield of flying below 100m

1 Like

It’s a mesh lining like kevlar and polyethylene. It’s not a solid block.

In denial is what you are.

I don’t ADS on Abrams except longer shots as well.
The only tanks that have small weakspots are stronger Leopard 2A5+ types, and T-90Ms at longer ranges.

Destroying T-series tanks that think their side armor is going to protect them as they attempt to swing around a corner is easy.

There is no evidence of Russian favoritism because America’s tech tree exists, which has more under-BR’d vehicles today than Soviets ever had.

Relying on enemies being worse than you at aiming isn’t a good strategy, cause at some point better players will be in better tanks.

There are thousands of posts claiming Russian bias, and zero posts proving it.
There are dozens of posts showing under-BR’d vehicles, and zero posts where the majority are Soviet.
Of course there isn’t American bias because of the under-BR’d vehicles, it’s just bad reading of stats.
The fact USA has the only T-80U UFP defeating at-any-range tanks in the game is deeply hilarious.

If Russian bias existed I wouldn’t have any battles in War Thunder.