Lol that is true however they could get the same effect with simple high carbon steel, why would they bother with such a potentially toxic metal like DU?
DU is heavier but offers ~1.5x the ME while High carbon steel also suffers from not rly doin much against heat (while DU climbs to 3x ME (!))
It definitely is a ragebait post. It took years, but people is finally realizing that the thing went beyond just a meme.
1 Like
Yeah but the cheeks were already immune to any heat thrown at it. And outside of a few NATO rounds there’s nothing that could pen them. Why would they bother with DU at all if the shattering effect wasn’t fairly significant.
im seeing too many of these ragebaiters, we got this guy and the alvis guy.
1 Like
i think you’ll find in the 100% accurate MMO WAR THUNDERtm 3bm60 goes thru unprotected cheeks. they made the change with the free to play MMO WAR THUNDERtm in mind.
1 Like
Alvis is stupid but he’s not a rage baiter, he genuinely believes everything he types
i am ragebaiting but im correct sooo, truth baiting? idk.
lol it all makes sense now
1 Like
unplayable dogshit on SU-27 release XDDDDDD 9ms on 16c’s and ja-39s were THE META, the unstoppable missile shield of flying below 100m
1 Like
It’s a mesh lining like kevlar and polyethylene. It’s not a solid block.
In denial is what you are.
I don’t ADS on Abrams except longer shots as well.
The only tanks that have small weakspots are stronger Leopard 2A5+ types, and T-90Ms at longer ranges.
Destroying T-series tanks that think their side armor is going to protect them as they attempt to swing around a corner is easy.
There is no evidence of Russian favoritism because America’s tech tree exists, which has more under-BR’d vehicles today than Soviets ever had.
Relying on enemies being worse than you at aiming isn’t a good strategy, cause at some point better players will be in better tanks.
There are thousands of posts claiming Russian bias, and zero posts proving it.
There are dozens of posts showing under-BR’d vehicles, and zero posts where the majority are Soviet.
Of course there isn’t American bias because of the under-BR’d vehicles, it’s just bad reading of stats.
The fact USA has the only T-80U UFP defeating at-any-range tanks in the game is deeply hilarious.
If Russian bias existed I wouldn’t have any battles in War Thunder.
oh fuck he was summoned
4 Likes
his name was mentioned… he appears….
2 Likes
What a relief, it’s not the same-same about Russian bias it’s a real thing but actually calling Russian bias a coping mechanism. Is for a fact that USSR is carried out by anti-air vehicles and its close air support capabilities but it doesn’t means that T-80BVM or T-90M are terrible either, but those aren’t the greatest at the same time compared to a M1A2 Abrams or Leopard 2.
For correction; the “BMPT nerf” is actually a general 30 mm 2A42 dispersion correction, this autocannon relies heavily on the firerate to compensate the dispension, it’s a real thing by the way, however I think that the 3UBR11 APDS-FS belt ammo should be more accurate, but anyways, it’s worse performing but being a real thing I’m more than fine with it, the more accurate, the better in my opinion, even if it has only downsides.
The “Relikt buff” is a correction as well and only works on angle, and specifically chassis-mounted Relikt, I might be wrong but it doesn’t apply to side-mounted ERA segments, nor 4S24 bags as well. People usually close their mind and only look into top tier; every nation has their strong points and I’d say that USA has pretty good points across most battle ratings.
2 Likes
The Rafale that is still underperforming flight wise? It’s overperforming in game but its still gimped compared to IRL
there you go
Unless the devs guesstimating a missile performance by its shape without knowing how it works inside is fine by you
KH38MT exists out of thin air though
For 1 patch, before that Pantsir S1 was a balance issue for more than a year
SM-SV was also added because the devs considered Buk to be underperforming. When taking the overall stats into account, several nations also had AAs performing even worse. What did they get ? Nothing. That’s a good example of preferential treatment if i’ve ever seen one
And BMPT, and Pantsir S1 before that, and LMUR
I will only agree on one thing : it’s contained to top tier ground and CAS specifically
The armor and modules on T-series is also an other example, it seems this time, they did not consider relikt brochure to be a marketing lie and took it as is.
Those tanks aren’t OP per se, but still very handheld, and should absolutely not be top tier if portrayed correctly
2 Likes
it’s overperforming compared to irl lol
1 Like
play low tier britain and shoot at anything soviet and then get back to me
is2 vs t34 heavy/tiger 2 hmmm let me think…
1 Like