I’ll be honest - I havent seen what the guns shoot like on the Dev server
My point still stands, it shouldn’t have special ammo belts that miraculously only explode outside the vehicle, when we’ve seen real life photo evidence of them being exposed to the crew
It’s like Bushmaster accuracy or even worse paired with a 7.3 APDS belt that’s 20% useless.
I wouldn’t be surprised if it took like triple digit amount of rounds to do anything at decent ranges.
It’s been able to be fragged hull-down since Gaijin changed the internal ammo location in the code.
Now, it’s not easy to do so, it’s rather difficult to hit that ammo.
With that said, I cannot create an opinion based on that.
Cause when I think of hull-down beasts my first thought is Leopard 2A5+ MBTs, whose turret weakspots are among the tiniest in the game, and that’s without a path to vulnerable ammo…
BUT, the last time I did shoot Leopard 2A5s their cannon breech was generating too many fragments compared to other tanks.
Conflicted thoughts in the head.
Gaijin still refuses to fix the cannon barrel bug in the Leopard 2s.In fact, this bug can now be regarded as a “deliberate weakening” They completely ignored what had happened to the other vehicles.
Pointless, launch warning is still triggered
It has it, @Smoak741 reported it, which then he was told ‘it’s a different modification’ which he later made a suggestion for, that got implemented, which got added withour lrf.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/yinkGTHaL2rs
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/YjZ4kp4l1FPK
This is such a pointless argument, just like when the vikhr was the only 10km heli atgm, with it being ‘op’ due to it’s range. It was good due to it’s speed (which has been heavily nerfed together with everyhting else). At maximum range it’s near useless.
Anyway if you’re going to get ouranged by a helicopter that’s just your fault + ever heard of intercepting? Heli’s effectivenes decreases drastically from far helipad anyway. Oh also most far helipads are close enough to be within 10km
If they fire from about 15km, you literally have ~50-60 seconds to intercept
Again, you could say that about literally anything ever, not a good argument.
In 99% of battles heli’s are going to be at 4-6km. And never farther, especially when you don’t uptier it yourself
Beautiful, also, mind sharing the M1A2 skin at ~02:10? Looks very sleek
We do not have LRF, as what he suggested and what we have are 2 different sights.
We have a earlier model, that only added a thermal channel over the standard sight.
It said it was ‘implemented’
It was not, and yes, it does have lrf irl
It was implemented wrong
Not this one, which we have in game. Gaijin added Early M1
To which, after they implemented the M1 wrong, told him to make a bug report about it. Should have LRF and better irst
They did not implement M1 wrong.
What we have in game is M1 from around 2010. The sight is a modification from 2020+ to the M1.
Read the screenshot
The one you posted?
The one that says your suggestion has been denied as something to be posted as a bug report?
Only if you know you have been shot at ADATS does not have a TWS like Pantsir. If the missile is no longer burning they are hard to see and ADATS even in the Radar screen mode is not guaranteed to intercept them.
Range and number of missiles is so important.
Pantsir has a longer range, ADATs has 8 single guidance missiles Pantsir has 12 and 2 30mms and can guide 4 missiles at once.
Pantsir should be changed to a free TOR
They know bro, imagine you getting paid to create happy little accidents.
Sounds right.
I made a few cameos here :P
It is @Smoak741’s ‘suggestion’ to add LRF and better irst to the 2S6M1 after it had been ‘implemented’
They told him to make a bug report about it.
