No you literally voted yes for this for everything that has been added and will be added.
In particular as part of this task, we’re currently separating and detailing the elevation and traverse drives of the M1 and Leopard 2 series tanks with the addition of a hydraulic drive supply tank, where disabling this part will also disable the guidance drive.
Yes absolutley they did that and didn’t even read the description on what they asking.
Literally dig grave for Soviet tech tree and found themselfs in it. What a beautiflul karma.
the initial idea came from players who were fed up with light tanks being empty. Gaijin then changed it to “everything” which is fine, but now they are not implementing those changes for everything
At no point in the vote there was a “we won’t add the modules for russian tanks or add them late so they can have yet an other unjustified advantage for a patch or 2”
This is labor intensive and painstaking work however, as it cannot be implemented for all ground vehicles in the game at once — each vehicle would require separate manual work.
If this kind of answer was spoken in a professional environment - you’d have been fired.
Doing half-assed job with a make-do attitude correlated renewing your CV
Ok so for a quick summary of russian bias so far we have :
KH38MT, existence unclear, added anyway. IR camera with questionable performances compared to known documentation
LMUR, 8 hardpoints instead of 4, Merkava and Strv 122, only vehicles to withstand it, see their roof armor nerfed the exact same patch
The manpads article, which can be resumed to : “USSR igla and Western Stinger and Mistral are visually the same, so we don’t think french or US engineers could make them turn harder” (the sentence itself is full of russian exeptionalism)
Relikt / western ERA / NERA (first one is lighter, but stronger against Kinetic AND chemical threats somehow)
Sovetsky Soyuz and VERY generous interpretation of what it theorically COULD have been
Pantsir SM-SV added right after buk, because “it was underperforming” according to Gaijin, but nations with SAMs performing even more poorly did not get anything
BMPT and the unconnected ammo belt
Addition of internal modules being a nerf to surivability => russia comes last
Most of these have an impact on top tier, which is the end of most people’s grind and an overall large pool of battles played.
The autoloader changes nothing, since you can still shoot back if your opponent missed that one charge by 2cm with spall disappearing to said autoloader
2s38 was the one thing that started it all, and players complained quite a lot, so Gaijin had to reluctently do something about it (i think it was also in the context of the review bombing, but i could get my timing wrong on this one)
This community is known for shooting themselves in the foot. Cry about APHE for ages, proceeds to vote against APHE changes. Cry about lack of damage their rounds make, proceeds to vote for detailed modules, cry about too much damage.
Well i mean im not working there how i should know what logic they have i don’t even know what their data you asking pointless question here. Best guess is T-series have less performance than Tanks who got additional modules so adding basket for now is pointless.
Well you got what you think you voted for and now getting what you really voted for.