It never says it has IRCCM it just says it has better targeting capabilities
Yes, hstv-l and AGS are better than all 10.0-11.0 ru MBTs.
Yeah and russian 8.0 is negative wr so what youre saying is that its about equipment, not players. Thank you for agreeing with me.
I don’t mind them being the same even if there is no source. My thing is they claim they need some crazy first party source from a credible element when they can simply improve the game by just buffing and nerfing vehicles. Top tier should be the most generic since there isn’t declassified information. But they keep ruining the game by guessing and making things hard for everyone
Even apart from the AIM, they say from A1 to A2 there were turret improvements but in game it’s the exact same. Apart from that they base M1A2T on SEP V3 which isn’t even in game but the turret again is copy and paste
1 Like
Yes a 12.0 vehicle is better than 10.0s-11.0s.
In other news, the sky is blue.
And we talk precisely about ground sim. Maybe they’re same if NATO gets planes from future while redfor has to fight with outdated tech and still winning
In other simplier words NATO gets better tech from higher br and still losing
No-no, you don’t understand. With tech NATO gets in 8_2_2 and 8_2 they supposed to have like 60% wr but they don’t.
But the moment brackets become more balanced(9_2) NATO players lose all winrate handhold by op tanks.
1 Like
That doesnt make a lick of sense, does the russian tree suddenly stop at 11.0 or what?
Or, get this, maybe it just changes who has better equipment.
Just look at those available light tanks for both sides. Truly comparable. Not biased at all
But even with this handholding red team able to hold 45-50%
NATO doesn’t get worse equipment in 9_2 and 10_2. Still losing
I really should have checked first…
Why some people are so desperate to argue on something they have no clue about? I’ll never understand
1 Like
It’s pretty crazy you’re discussing Sim (I think you are, I’m not entirely sure whats being discussed right now), when Gaijin doesnt even know Sim exists
i mean, i’m not playing sim. but how does this matter in 1 player perspective?
if i play my main, let say japan, how is that fair for that nation line up against ussr?
I have no skin in this debate but I’d recommend charging your phone
1 Like
According to you
Rich coming from you who insisted on giving comments about how CAS doesnt impact games while having not a single rank 8 or 9 vehicle.
1 Like
The best thing is that theres always someone new and always leads to the same “revers an deprechio bad” thing.
Want to give a special shout out to all the Russian bias folks who went for the KV-8.
We lost every match against russia, russian tanks were just too strong. They felt so bad for us they decided to just give us the win by letting us cap and wait out game. I am very grateful to Russian mains for giving us poor NATO tanks the ease we need. I know russian bias is way too strong in game and my poor 17 pounder just can’t do much in game against stalinaium.
2 Likes
I mean the there are turret armor improvements from the base M1A1 to the M1A2.
The M1A1 HC is from the same time period as the M1A2, they share the same armor package.
April 2026 winrates
Top tier GRB Russia is so green, colorblind people can’t even see the colors there anymore
what turret armor improvements did you see in the abrams A1 to A2?